My simple approach to the two economic systems are that neo-liberal economics is basically very rich people saying "make the country richer by making ourselves even richer and we will make sure that you get a little of our wealth" this is produced by a market economy and very few rules. Keynesian economics is saying "make the country richer by enriching everyone". This is produced by a mixed economy and higher taxation.
It would be interesting to hear from those that espouse the libertarian model of imposing a completely free market with minimal taxes as the most pragmatic way to govern, why the mixed economies of Sweden and the other Nordic countries work so well.
I think these economies - or some of them - might also answer some of the question about climate change and the global economy.
Sometimes it’s just the small things that press the bruise isn’t it? 😢
