Corbyn's Magnetism

I am quite aware of The Sun and Hillsborough, I am also aware of the findings of the enquiry, the police lied the Sun printed the lies.

The Sun can use Corbyn's words when asked about calling Hamas his friends - with hindsight I was wrong,

The piece of art was clearly anti semitic. It fuels the myth that the Jewish people rule the world's finances.

The s*n can use anyone's words. There's a difference between the paper using someone's words and the local MP writing for the s*n.
I thought you liked the idea of respect, Annie.
You are just arguing the point because I said about it, not because you agree with Frank Field writing for the s*n, I hope.

The Sun reported the information released by a corupt police force , fact.

The piece of art was clearly anti semitic. It fuels the myth that the Jewish people rule the world's finances.

Wasn't it of actual leading and influential bankers Iam? Where does it refer to their religion?

Respect for the community doesn't matter, does it not, Annie?

If you are MP for an area that will not even sell the s*n, don't you think it shows lack of respect writing for it?

Message deleted by Gransnet

Respect for the community doesn't matter, does it not

Not if you're painting anti-semitic murals!

Corbyn didn't paint the mural. You're getting absurd now.
Frank Field wrote articles for the s*n despite knowing the history of Hillsborough.

I am always bothered by any censorship of art. It usually indicates some underlying problem that exists and that the artist is drawing attention to. The objection of course varies according to the society the work is criticising. There's a list here www.elist10.com/top-10-controversial-paintings-art-history/ most of these wouldn't be considered controversial now. There was also the case of the Black Christ a painting in S. Africa banned during apartheid www.sahistory.org.za/dated-event/controversial-black-jesus-painter-ronald-harrison-dies
If this work of art was anti-semitic I still see no reason to ban it. There has been much said about Communist authoritarian regimes, well one of the things they do is ban art they find unacceptable.

Is it a group of "Jewish" bankers Primrose? I thought it was a group of leading bankers. They appear to be real people so I am not sure how you could paint them not to look like themselves. Do they look like a group of "Jewish" bankers to you?

Tom London

It is deeply depressing that some of Jeremy Corbyns political opponents make baseless smears of anti-semitism against him in order to seek political advantage.

Not only is this very wrong in itself, it also makes the actual fight against anti-semitism that much harder

I assume the "Jewish" label is because they are men with big noses and beards, but they are also older men and one of the bits of our body that keeps growing is our nose. The beards are grey, so arguably you could say that the mural is ageist, as it depicts older men running the world.
Perhaps anti-semitism is in the eye of the beholder in this case.

I was trying to look at the painting objectively Primrose. You, it appears, can only make personal derogatory remarks.

Not only is this very wrong in itself, it also makes the actual fight against anti-semitism that much harder

My point exactly whitewave.

Message deleted by Gransnet.

Your post is sooo wrong primrose I have reported it.

<sigh>

The defence of Corbyn is unbelievable, if he shot someone I suppose we would read - he was sold a faulty gun

Disgusting, so much defence around this mural from some GN posters!
Even Corbyn admits he was wrong to endorse it.
It is clearly anti-semitic. So trisher and GGM2 and anyone else who tries to make out the men in the mural are not meant to be Jewish or may not be Jewish etc......take a good hard look at yourselves as well as at that mural!

Even if it is anti-semitic (and I think it is a debatable point) it is a work of art and as such shuld be permitted to show what it thinks is wrong in society. The alternative is that we completely ban such views, which results in more conspiarcy theories and underground movements. But none of you have posted why YOU think it is anti-Semitic, simply reitterated the views of others. Is this because you are unable to assess works of art or you think your view is unacceptable in some way? I certainly would allow anyone to say it is anti-semitic if they wish. what I don't accept is that that necessarily means it should be banned. People have posted much about Communist regimes but seem to feel the same policies are acceptable if they favour the action. I don't.

So Primrose is being reported because her post is soooo wrong by a poster who called me a vindictive Christian , no I didn't bother to report it

annie when did I call you a vindictive Christian? I’d be grateful if you could point me to the thread, because if it is simply as you suggest I will apologise unreservedly.