The mood is dark in discussions on the WhatsApp groups that bring together disgruntled non-Corbynite parliamentarians; they buzz with talk of resignations and splits. Some in Labour are facing up to the fact that, by bringing in hundreds of thousands of new members, Mr Corbyn has remade their party in his own leftist image.
I think this is to misunderstand what has happened. I cannot access the whole article which may, of course, take the argument further but this is doing exactly what posters have done on GN in the past; the so called "non-Corbynites" are heaping all the blame, for people being attracted to a move into a different area of politics, on just one man. And it appear to be just because it is a different direction to the one they wish to go in. This is being deliberately blind to the fact that their politics did not appeal whereas, the politics of what appears to many to be more "true" Labour, does.
Why not start a new party? If they are as sure as they appear to be that they are right, people would recognise that. If they believe people believe what they suggest, they should believe those people will join them. I appreciate the unions and their money would stay with "True Labour" but they didn't seem to want the unions anyway. It is really just by luck the Corbyn was the one on the left to be in the right place when the mood changed. They need to show how their politics differ - does anyone on here know - actual political ethos, not rhetoric? And they need to stop attacking one man. If they don't, eventually people will see them for the empty vestal they currently sound like. They are just making a great deal on noise with nothing, or so it appears, to back it up. They need to be prepared, and brave enough, to say what that is.