It has been said that when Parliament meets to discuss England only legislation, following EVEL rules, it is, in effect The Parliament of England. I do not think that EVEL is the best solution by a long chalk. It is, rather, a cobbled together, cut price, make do and mend solution, triggered by panic when so many Scots supported Independence and sent 56 SNP MPs to Westminster with only 1 seat each for Lib, Lab, and Con. The proper solution, of course, would be to have a devolved parliament for England BUT that would require elections, a chamber + committee rooms, offices, etc. and expenses/salaries for over 500 elected members. Remembering the furore around the cost of setting up the Scottish Parliament, I can't see much public support for this scenario, much simpler to use existing buildings and MPs
It has been amusing to see my own, new, constituency Conservative MP (English born, bred and resident) ejected from the chamber because he was a Scottish MP and bleating that he thought the EVEL rules only applied to SNP MPs.
Here is further information on EVEL: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33370064