Bridget. "Allygran1 you can only interpret my view through your own window of thought process."
My response to you Bridgeit, is that the interpretation of your view is from your words, not my mindset, which is the word you might have been looking for instead of "window of thought process".
When you say: "I am not ridiculing any one or any side". Then you are deluding yourself. Words convey messages Bridgeit yours "the great British public (or not)" That is what you said.
As for your personal, unnecessary, words aimed at me, clearly designed to detract from the question you were asked. You say:
"I remember asking you before if you were a fairly young person, I beleive you must be,or fairly narrow in your understanding of others, hence your one dimensional approach to anyone you don’t understand or agree with."
My view is that apart from being extraordinarily untrue and silly, those words are both one dimensional and childlike.
You are a good side stepper Bridgeit, however, it only serves to highlight when you do post this sort of defensive response that rather than just answer the question you were asked you defend when it is not necessary. I have better things to do with my time, than play immature games.
Your original words Bridgeit:
"Bridgeit Sun 22-Jul-18 13:53:34
I dare-say Jura, that Gn is even more of an education about the Great (or not) British public than was ever anticipated & a bit of an eye opener !"
Now if we stick to the issue rather than attacking me Bridgeit, your latest post is saying with regard to the question I asked you:
"The great British public to many of us of a certain age is an endearing description to convey a common denominator which many , but not all will take as the majority who have a standard ( just to qualify this could be good or bad, or positive or negatives) or thought pattern that binds them together some may wish to call patriotism , something that is understood without having to explain, or qualify or even quantify,it will be something that is just understood a bit like all being ABBA fans or football supporters etc."
Well, yes it does and no doesn't is the response to your self contradictory words. The great British public to many of us is an endearing description absolutely, not though as you confusingly describe in your post and shown above. It is much more simple and clear than that as far as my age group is concerned it conveys an overarching sense of what is right and wrong, a basic common sense, togetherness in adversity and the dignity of a people who belong to a set of respected values recognised across the world. When you bring that into question in the context in which it was used and then by qualifying your words " the Great (or not) British public than was ever anticipated & a bit of an eye opener !", you call into question those commonly held views and values even if it is only for us on GN. Which is clearly what you intended. I would have thought more of you had you just said that, than the evasion.
Now it is important to keep this in perspective, you were only being trite, and a bit "clever" and sloppy in your use of the well respected and acknowledge term, "the great British public" in the context of the section of the great British public who use GN. Not the entire Nation, again this qualifies it even further and contextualises and clarifies your intended meaning when you added 'or not'.
So Bridgeit, back to the question, does this mean that you are in the "great British public group or the (or not) group on GN? And did you mean that the leave group are the "great British public" or the "or not" group? on GN? That was the question. Simple question.
