The main issue once again comes down to accepting the majority voting system. Do you Bridgeit, Varian, crystaltipps, accept that the UK uses a majority voting system?
When you say Bridgeit" ^whilst standing on the deck of a ship called Rule Britannia waving a uanion Jack^".
Why so anti British? Totally exaggerated and typical of the "message" of Nationalism gone mad that you and others like to put out. You are wrong!
What I, and certainly those I know and talk to, believe in our Democracy. That Democracy depends on rule of Law, honouring majority vote, and protecting our system from anarchists.
There is a hugh difference between trying to bring down a democratic majority vote, attempting through subversive activity to overturn the results of two Elections and the normal campaigning for change using the political system.
You then say:
"^Others take a more pragmatic view realising that the long reaching tentacles of the EU,(good & bad) will take many years to untangle & straighten out^".
This statement is not accurate. According to Bernier 80% of the negotiations are done, the untangling the disconnect/ uncoupling is, and has been going on for two years. There will (maybe) the transition period not to untangle as you put it, but to implement any changes resulting from our agreement's with the EU. It maybe that we have no transition and go WTO.
You then say:
"^Then & only then can we begin to Mould our country which is good for The Many, Not the Few^" !!
Has it not occurred to you that the vote Leave, came from a cross section of society, including a cross section of political allegiances. It is truly representative of the people by majority.
The General Election saw two Political party's who stood on Brexit mandates put back into power as Government and Opposition. The Government with the largest increase share of the vote since the 1980's. How much more can that tell you that the majority are "the many not the few".
You say:
"^To believe otherwise is pointless, what frightens me the most is the absolutely blinkered certainty on both sides that they are right,but there is no right or wrong^"
Sadly this is easy to say and sound's good, but when you say: "^There is no right or wrong^" it is simply wrong! Of course their is right and wrong. It is right that the majority of the British people a cross section of the population and political allegiances voted in the Referendum by majority to Leave the EU. It is right that the majority of the population presumably a cross section also voted in a General Election to put two parties back in power in Government and Opposition who stood for election on Brexit mandates.
You say:
"^Either way this country will survive and adapt^".
Yes it will!
You then add:
"^ but we need to remember it was an emotive vote^".
What does emotive mean? A word banded about as a cover all, designed to diminish the leave vote and the General Election vote. Emotive:
arousing or able to arouse intense feeling.
"^animal experimentation is an emotive subject^^synonyms:inflammatory, controversial, contentious, emotional^
Why do you say it was an emotive vote? Why is it that the voters are accused of 'emotive' decision making. The only emotive people I saw were the campaigners on both sides. We the voters were busy getting on with our lives and doing our own decision making. Since then the 'emotive' behaviour of the Pro Europe groups as they are now known, have become increasingly determined and I would say at all cost's to over turn the majority vote and threaten Democracy. There are other groups that have hijacked the Remain campaign groups for their own ends.
The question was Leave or Remain, Yes or N0. The extensive campaigns that became emotive, and by that I choose to use the meaning, inflammatory, contentious, not emotional for many, but maybe for some. We will never no what motivated each individual voter. The polls are often wrong, and depend on people giving their reason's truly. I never give pollsters my true reasons, and nor do lot's of people. They earn a small fortune from asking us to tell them what we think and why we think it. Why should we feel compelled to do so!
The result is that we the British people voted to leave..and then confirmed that at the General Election.
You say:
"^That is why there will always be discontent, because there is no Promised Land^".
Why will there always be discontent? You say "^because there is no Promised Land^". The EU is portrayed as the "promised land", as we have seen it is not, so I fully agree with you there is no Promised Land.
As we see from some remain campaign groups, or as they are now styling themselves Pro Europe or Peoples vote, who continue to believe that the EU is the promised land as you put it.
The majority of the British people do not agree and believe that we can take back control of our borders, control of our laws, and control of our ability to trade in a free market worldwide, and recover our Sovereignty. No one has promised that recovering our sovereign rights from a Trading organisations called the EU, pretending to be a Nation, pretending to have citizens by issuing us all with a Passport saying EU Citizen. There is no EU Country! There are 27 Country's who have through trading agreements to trade in a single market surrendered by stealth their sovereign laws, rights. All are tied into trading agreements that have hooks that demand they obey regulations, the four so called freedoms, which really are enslavement to the EU. No one can leave as we are finding without enormous barriers being placed in their way. As we see this so called "promised land" created by the EU using 27 Country's lumped into what is known as the EEA, is disintegrating before our very eyes.
Whatever Brexit brings, it will be of our own making and to our own benefit or not, and more importantly our own majority choice. This Country works on a Democratic system of majority vote. Contrary to what has been said about the "many not the few", it has to be for all!
Sorry I am having trouble getting the italics symbols to work! Not much time so please excuse the slap dash!
