JE I’ve heard that point debated over the last two days. I think there’s a general point here first of all. In equality legislation, it is the victims perception that something is racist that matters. If someone at work kept putting a banana on your desk and you were black, the perpetrator would be guilty of racial harassment if you perceived that act as racist. He would be judged by what you felt, not what he meant or his intent ie a joke. When you think about it, if it becomes about intent, then every deliberate racist called out would plead he didn’t mean to be racist - it would be a perpetual get out of jail free defence. So moving onto the DB case, certainly what he tweeted was racist. His initial apologies demonstrated he didn’t ‘get it’. Really that’s enough for action to be taken against him because he’s a nationwide broadcaster and should have known. Whether he really did know or not at one level is irrelevant.