I’m with you here WW, blimey, what a can of worms I’ve opened up again over Brexit. But thanks to the posters who educated me a bit about Twitter. As I’m not on it, I suppose I must have formed my opinions from what I’ve heard through the media, and it always seemed to be that some unsavoury character had tweeted rape or death threats to someone well known. Or Trump twittering on about something or other.
At least it appears that some Gransnetters, and therefore one assumes other people are getting something positive out of the other threads. None the less I think I’ll give it a miss. I think Brexit is a toxic enough subject just on Gransnet, I don’t want to join any threads in the more toxic Twitter.
However, whilst I’m all for free speech normally, I really feel that people who threaten rape, murder, or violence of any kind should be barred from Twitter, and investigated by the police, and then charged (if a crime has been committed.) They should not be able to get away with such vile behaviour. But in the case of Matt Kelly, re the original post, clearly what he wrote was disgusting and unpleasant, and most certainly ageist, but not as far as I know, in any way against the law, so to conclude, he is allowed to be so unpleasant. It doesn’t say much for his character though, does it?