This is ridiculous.
Is the concept of a Political Party choosing their successor when the Leader resigns so difficult to understand???
A General Election means a Political Party, NOT, an individual is elected. End of.
An election in the devolved nations means a Political Party, NOT, an individual is elected. End of.
This procedure is blatantly obvious and it is also blatantly obvious only the Political Party, Of ANY COLOUR !!!!!! , chooses their Leader.
This is not undemocratic.
This is usual procedure.
The fact is ' Democracy ' and ' Established Procedures ' are only ' acceptable ', only suit ' some ' individuals if and when the outcome fits their politics but they cry shouts of Undemocratic / disgraceful when the outcome does not. It is also used for propaganda, spin but for the most part it is hypocrisy!
Whether it be Tony Blair/Gordon Brown, Theresa May/Boris Johnson or any possible future Resignations of a Prime Minister, possibly Jeremy Corbyn/ Boris Johnson their respective political parties have the democratic right to vote for their successor.
The only way to change the system is to legislate that on the resignation of the Prime Minister/First Minister of a devolved nation a General Election must take place. What grounds can be found to overturn the democratic election of a Political Party of ANY colour after a General Election will however in my mind be ' UNDEMOCRATIC '.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »



