Gransnet forums

News & politics

Boris has lost the vote!

(119 Posts)
GagaJo Tue 03-Sept-19 22:23:50

Commons voted 328 to 301 to take control of the agenda, meaning they can bring forward a bill seeking to delay the UK's exit date.

Joelsnan Wed 04-Sept-19 16:48:35

Surely we have been told time and again that a ‘deal’ cannot be discussed until we actually leave the union.
What is under discussion is the Withdrawal Agreement which is different and is about control and funding etc.
Countries who have never been in the union go straight to trade deals and most end up with free trade deals without the weighted snakes and ladders game being foisted upon UK by EU wrapped up as a withdrawal agreement.
So it is not a case of leaving with no deal as there will be no deal until we leave.

Firecracker123 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:49:07

It shows Boris has balls lol

Whitewavemark2 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:49:29

Someone just tweeted, it was an utterly shitty way for Johnson to treat someone who has served his party for 37 years.

It was like watching an old bull elephant staggering into the forest to die.

lemongrove Wed 04-Sept-19 16:50:23

Well said Joelsnan that is indeed the case!

Dollybird1 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:51:36

Yes Gb is a laughing stock. My German friends say they rule Europe.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:52:22

And the reason Johnson can’t negotiate the WA is?

GrannyGravy13 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:55:37

Politicians are meant to go along with "their whip" they had been warned prior to the vote of the consequences, at least Boris has stuck to his word on this issue!

Joelsnan Wed 04-Sept-19 16:55:45

And the reason Johnson can’t negotiate the WA is?
Because the plutocrats are pulling the strings

Firecracker123 Wed 04-Sept-19 16:57:38

You have it in one Joelnan ?

Day6 Wed 04-Sept-19 17:04:46

Exactly Joelsnan

What is under discussion is the Withdrawal Agreement which is different and is about control and funding etc

And that WA was rejected, three times. The EU has refused to make amendments.

The WA that exists ties us to the EU and is so convoluted and bound up with references to past treaties, declarations, regulations etc, which are cross-referenced to other acts, clauses, sub clauses, etc, etc that it is impossible almost to see where any freedom from the EU exists.

The EU has also said that the period of transition will end in 2020 (?) which, given we took almost three years to compile (dreadful) withdrawal terms, gives us no time at all to make amendments which are advantageous to the UK, rather than the EU. Unless that period of transition is also extended the EU has us over a barrel - still.

Parliament last night more of less decided it was OK to push the UK into an even tighter corner, at the mercy of the EU.

Do Remainer MPs value the UK at all? Their no deal/delay vote makes us look cheap, helpless and begging for EU mercy, which we will continue to pay BILLIONS for.

Anja Wed 04-Sept-19 17:07:14

There are other options Day6 it is this kind of binary thinking that has held negotiations back.

Day6 Wed 04-Sept-19 17:14:00

There are other options Day6 it is this kind of binary thinking that has held negotiations back

OK, so name the ones beneficial to the UK given the time frame and EU intransigence?

Yet more delay was not in our interests, and we were much more likely to get a deal to suit us both with No Deal one of our options.

Basically we are playing poker with the EU (and the UK's future) by showing our hand throughout. Brussels has us by the short and curlies once again and that's how Remainer MPs seem to like it.

It's pathetic.

CarlyD7 Wed 04-Sept-19 17:41:56

I wish people who clearly don't understand democracy would stop whining on about it. We live in a Parliamentary Democracy - which means we give parliament (which we have voted in) the right to make rules on our behalf. Parliament is looking out for the welfare of the whole country - hence they are not willing to take the risk of a No Deal Brexit and that's the responsible thing to do. (And, incidentally, I don't remember a no deal brexit being talked about during the referendum campaign - oh no; it was all about the sweet deal we were going to get oh so easily; how we'd have all the advantages of EU trade without any of the responsibilities - like paying money in; so, basically, we were lied to by a group of fantasists).

Joelsnan Wed 04-Sept-19 17:53:09

We live in a Parliamentary Democracy - which means we give parliament (which we have voted in) the right to make rules on our behalf. Parliament is looking out for the welfare of the whole country

A somewhat naive perception. Its like believing the wolf in grandmas bed in Hansel and Gretel is really Grandma.

growstuff Wed 04-Sept-19 17:54:19

It's not a naïve perception. It's how our parliamentary democracy has worked for centuries.

Nandalot Wed 04-Sept-19 18:26:23

Well said, Growstuff and Carly.

Nandalot Wed 04-Sept-19 18:28:12

Am I the only one to find Boris’ comment to Corbyn about being ‘ A big girl’s blouse’ objectionable? He may be rattled but I don’t expect a British Prime Minister to resort to the language of the playground.

Joelsnan Wed 04-Sept-19 18:38:13

growstuff
So, if BJ &co had got their plans through then that would be okay because they were democratically elected and looking out for the welfare of the whole country? That must be the case mustn’t it, because you agree that they are charged with making rules on our behalf. Or is that only when it suits your agenda?
The government’s recent actions were tested in court on more than one occasion and found to be legal.

Joelsnan Wed 04-Sept-19 18:41:50

Nandalot
Yes,
Terminology is not a problem. Policy, honesty, trustworthiness, abiding by manifesto statements which got them elected are more important. Personality and eccentricity less so.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 04-Sept-19 18:46:34

The character of our Prime Minister

Nick Boles MP

I will never forgive Boris Johnson for inflicting on my dear friend
@NSoames
such a brutal end to his parliamentary career. If anyone had any doubt about our Prime Minister’s character or morals, look no further.

Nandalot Wed 04-Sept-19 18:54:53

Joelsnan, yes honesty and trustworthiness.......can I say those words in the same sentence as Boris Johnson? No.

absthame Wed 04-Sept-19 19:15:12

joelsnan of course you can:
Honesty and trustworthiness are strangers to BJ, however lies and deception define his nature ........see it's easy when you try gringrin

Labaik Wed 04-Sept-19 19:15:45

Unfortunately for this country, Johnson is just a journalist; worse still a journalist who based his career on making things up. And he now thinks he can get away with that as PM.

Firecracker123 Wed 04-Sept-19 19:21:58

Whitewave Faux outrage me thinks ?

MamaCaz Wed 04-Sept-19 19:35:09

Joelsnan
So, if BJ &co had got their plans through then that would be okay because they were democratically elected and looking out for the welfare of the whole country? That must be the case mustn’t it, because you agree that they are charged with making rules on our behalf. Or is that only when it suits your agenda?

I think you might be confusing the words 'parliament' and 'Government'?