icanhandthemback, I don't think you are correct about the ECJ. I think you should check your facts:-
(Extract from the Law Society website)
The ECJ can hear cases from the national courts through the 'preliminary ruling' system. This involves a national court referring a question on the interpretation of EU law to the ECJ. The ECJ decides the correct interpretation and sends the case back to the national court for a final decision. It is still up to the national court to decide issues of its own nation's laws.
The European Commission can also take a case against an EU state to the General Court. These cases ask the court to decide whether the member state is in breach of its obligations to the EU. In some narrow cases, such as a state being a repeat offender and where it has failed to implement an EU directive, the court can fine a member state.
An EU state can also take another member to the court. This does not happen often, only where there is a political interest for the state to ask the court about a point of EU law.
Finally, the court can perform a judicial review of EU law. This means it has the power to review EU regulations and directives and make sure they comply with EU treaties and general principles of law.
Sometimes it’s just the small things that press the bruise isn’t it? 😢
Support and friendship for those whose lives have been affected by estrangement.
