Gransnet forums

News & politics

bloody whinging royals

(494 Posts)
paddyann Fri 18-Oct-19 22:45:32

we had Harry all over the "news" earlier now his wife has joined in with the whinging about how hard their life is!! Honestly ..they should have to live the lives of millions in this country and then they would know how HARD life can get .Why is it NEWS anyway? If its so hard they can always walk away .

merlotgran Sat 19-Oct-19 11:13:12

Harry and William leaned on each other after their mother's death. They were close.

Harry's marriage has changed all that. He's now leaning on his wife who has a 'me, me, me' approach to life in the spotlight. I've never been one to criticise the stiff upper lip way of coping because it's what the Royals do and they do it very well. Charles kept his feelings to himself after Mountbatten was assassinated and the Queen lost her mother and sister within a few months of each other but the only time I've seen her shed a tear was when Britannia was decommissioned.

Making the Well Child event all about 'him' was a big mistake. Every parent hopes and prays that their expected baby will be healthy so breaking down in front of parents who were not so lucky is unforgiveable.

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 11:14:55

You don't think he deliberately cried at that event do you? He must have been so embarrassed.

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 11:16:32

A man can't lean on his brother all his life. Of course he loves his own little family first and foremost.

notanan2 Sat 19-Oct-19 11:19:52

Di's popularity only really exploded post humorously.

In life she had some admirers but she wasnt really universally liked.

W is old enough to remember who she was. No saint.

H seems to have mixed up the Di of her obituaries with the reality, possibly because he was younger so renembers the real thing less.

Still no excuse. And nobody as asking or expecting him or M to walk in her footsteps. He has decided that he and M must live Dis life not their own.
Yet in the next breath he is lashing out at anything her percieves to be history re-writing. Even when for e.g. the BBC was on Ms side re the "race traitor" stuff.

Its not healthy

merlotgran Sat 19-Oct-19 11:21:11

Yes, of course he does, Gonegirl but he shouldn't allow his private life, thoughts and feelings to spill over into his public duties.

He always used to be able to control his feelings. He saw some pretty awful stuff as an army officer serving in Afghanistan. It prompted him to start the Invictus Games and motivate injured servicemen.

That's the human but strong Harry we remember.

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 11:24:52

But how can one person divide themself up like that? It's not possible. Children are first and foremost in his mind at the moment because they've just produced one of their own.

People are allowed to be brave and have normal over-emotional feelings. We all do at certain times of our lives.

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 11:25:57

Crying, even publicly, doesn't necessarily show weakness. It's human.

SirChenjin Sat 19-Oct-19 11:30:37

But not all the time as these two seem to - most people seem to operate just fine without needing to share their feelings with complete strangers to that extent.

I get the distinct impression that they thought that everyone would love them and hang onto their every word as they sought to tackle the great injustices of the world - but instead they’ve managed to alienate and irritate people and the press

merlotgran Sat 19-Oct-19 11:48:31

Just as well military personnel serving during our two World Wars managed to control their feelings when thoughts of their families must have been uppermost in their minds.

It is possible to separate a working environment from your private life. Doctors do it all the time. How could a surgeon operate on a critically ill child if he was wiping back tears because he's just had a healthy one of his own? hmm

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 11:51:36

I would think staying alive would have been uppermost in their minds tbh.

I don't think you can compare one human being with another. We are all different.

Anniebach Sat 19-Oct-19 12:00:08

The royals don’t share their troubles and worries with the world , the Queen did show emotion when the Britannia was decommissioned but there was one other time, when she stood and looked at the graves of the children in Aberfan, her eyes filled with tears but she quickly got herself together.

It is possible to keep one’s private and public life separate, the royals are described as ‘being stiff upper lipped’, am sure they have shed tears , had worries, suffered grief , but in private not
on the world stage.

SueDonim Sat 19-Oct-19 12:08:21

I'm not unsympathetic towards the changes Harry & Meghan have had in the past two years. It's all been a bit whirlwind for them and I like(d) them both. What I don't understand is what they're trying to achieve by all this publicity-seeking. What message are they trying to send? What do they want us to do?

My take is that Harry is now at a crossroads of his life. He's a bit of an action man and having to leave the armed forces left him rudderless. He'll never be king, being a husband and father is unlikely to fill his time, given the amount of help they have. It's a bit like Princess Margaret, in some ways. It can't be fun, knowing your role was as The Spare and now even that has been removed from you. What is Harry's role in life to be?

MissAdventure Sat 19-Oct-19 12:09:13

I'm not sure a stiff upper lip helps anyone, in light of how many people have mental health issues.
Its only in very recent times its even been acceptable to talk about depression, anxiety, and so on.

Harry and Meghan are of the 'share everything' ilk, just the same as lots of people these days.

For the record, in spite of being very stiff upper lipped myself, I have cried on the bus to work, in the arms of a kind woman in the job centre, on the shoulder of a woman at the bus stop, and all sorts of embarrassing places since my daughter died.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 19-Oct-19 12:30:20

Grief is all consuming, it’s the price we pay for loving.

I will not judge others on how they deal with their grief.

They have public duties, the majority of which are decided by The Government and Civil Servants, who need to “put UK in the best light”, and gain publicity for the cause/charity.

In two years they have met, married and had a child. They are finding their feet in front of the worlds press. Meghan's family are estranged and it is none of our business why. Endless speculation about that and comparing them to Prince Williams family who are being groomed for their roll as future Monarch and consort, is taking its toll on this couple.

Anniebach Sat 19-Oct-19 12:39:00

They have many examples on how to cope with the world press , seems they choose just one

SirChenjin Sat 19-Oct-19 12:43:44

Exactly Annie

If they are finding things difficult then they need to get some good PR advice from a neutral party and lie low for the next year or so. It’s not rocket science.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 19-Oct-19 12:54:14

If H & M were to “lie low for the next year or so” I will put money on there being a GN thread about them not pulling their weight with regards to Royal duties!!!!

SirChenjin Sat 19-Oct-19 12:59:05

Then I think you’d be out of pocket - they could quite easily pull back on the grandstanding on the slab stage whilst undertaking plenty of basic royal duties of the ribbon cutting variety. I doubt that would interest either of them though.

SirChenjin Sat 19-Oct-19 12:59:32

Sleb stage

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 13:03:30

I agree GrannyGravy. They have to do their royal work. And it is work.

SirChenjin Sat 19-Oct-19 13:05:04

Is it heck.

Bridgeit Sat 19-Oct-19 13:08:12

I don’t understand why Paddyann started this thread, she has already told us I another thread that she & her husband make money from selling photographs that they take of the RF.
Hypocrisy it seems goes across the board !

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 13:09:10

?

Anniebach Sat 19-Oct-19 13:12:39

Royal duties do not involve telling the world how difficult one’s life is.

Gonegirl Sat 19-Oct-19 13:13:59

But if people keep getting at you and yours, wouldn't you want to reply?