Clive Lewis is now standing He’s a very good bloke
US troops forced to act on the ground?
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Just read Kier Starmer’s leadership pitch and was impressed. He’s calling for a return to a broad-church Party, but warns not to lurch too far to the right as a knee-jerk reaction.
It appears he was not allowed to speak during the election campaign which is a shame as he is a powerful speaker and powerful advocate of socialist values.. He is not a fan of McCluskey so unlikely to get his nomination.
Could we perhaps open up a sensible discussion on the likely candidates from those interested, and no just one-sentence put downs?
Clive Lewis is now standing He’s a very good bloke
Good post Joelsnan. I agree.
Working full time and still being in poverty in the 5th richest country in the world is shocking.
I've not been able to move from Clive Lewis's "on your knees bitch" comment.
Iam64
Then the year after that he made the mock suicide gesture in the Hoc. ?
And he is a Corbyn supporter
Is Clive Lewis, or Emily Thornberry, or Yvette Cooper, or Keir Starmer or any of the Corbyn groupies, in favour of electoral reform?
That is the question I would ask before voting for any of them if I were a member of the Labour Party.
varian, so far as I can tell, the only potential candidate who is in favour of PR is Jess Phillips. She hasn't yet announced she'll run. I like her but the Momentum group dislike her intensely which could rule her out. I'm not sure she's ready to be leader but she'd be a great deputy - here's hoping.
I agree Jess Phillips would be an excellent deputy leader .
Of those who have been named as possible contenders for
leadership, not for me.
Not even Keir Starmer Annie?
I have liked him since his work in the legal profession. It seems that currently, he's trying to bridge the gulf between the left and the right (to use those simplistic terms) in the LP. Is that possible? I do hope so.
Yehbutnobut
"POGS finding your waffling hard to follow, sorry. So cannot answer your point until you make it clearer."
----
My point is very clear, you challenged my post and you made an accusation to which I asked quite clearly " what article'?
You should not challenge a post unless you can substantiate or confirm your reasoning.
Otherwise the word ' waffle' does apply.
Iam Starmer may be able to bridge the gulf but reach out
to voters across the country ? I am unsure.
Jess Phillips shows immature traits when tweeting. I would hope for someone with a more states person like demeanour than what she displays so she could carry the nation with her...she would not be my choice, or Long Bailey. Best of a bad bunch would for me be Starmer. But they need a clear direction which would attract the workers the party was conceived to fight for.
Many workers the party were conceived to fight for no longer
exist, there are no heavy industries now, no coal mines, iron works, ship yards etc
How is Keir Starmer trying to ' Bridge the gap' when he states :-
" What Corbyn bought to the Labour party was a change of emphasis - radicalism that really matters - we need to build on that, not oversteer and go back to a bygone age."
Does that not imply Starmer is content to set his stall out as being positioned well and truly in the Corbyn/McDonnell camp and thus holds the same policies that has just seen Labour trounced in the General Election.
I admit to being surprised by his stance and I believe he understands to get elected as Leader he must have the backing of the Unions and Momentum but heck he has a bit of a slog trying to compete with Rebecca Long Bailey who has strongly been seen as McDonnells successor.
The elected Labour Leader will most probably be whom the Unions/Momentum choose and it will take an extroidinary change of guard in the Labour membership to overcome that point and the odds are ' stacked' against that happening in my opinion.
I agree POGS
Hopefully, the election of someone from the Corbyn/McDonnell school will lead to a breakaway party which can gather up all the other moderates and then use the next 5 years to consolidate.
kitty they would be taking on the Unions and Momentum
kittyLester Quote [ Hopefully, the election of someone from the Corbyn/McDonnell school will lead to a breakaway party which can gather up all the other moderates and then use the next 5 years to consolidate. ] End Quote.
kittyLester, do you mean a breakaway party being brought forward in the same manner as "Change UK", or was it "The Independence Group" as I have difficulty remembering now due to the fact they seemed to rewrite their name and leading figures every few weeks.
There is also the major problem of where or from whom will the funding be coming from for any fresh left-leaning political party in Britain.
It takes a great deal of money to fund a meaningful political party and in that have any chance of winning elections.
Yes, money, this is how the Unions control the Labour Party.
I think 3 left the Labour Party because of anti semetism, they lost their jobs, principles first can cost a heavy price.
1Anniebach the Parliamentary Labour Party and the Trade Unions are one and the same. They have been for over one hundred years and if anything it is the Trade Unions who may well end that longtime link at the present time.
The unions will not end the link, they can’t control the Conservative Party, perhaps McClusky is a closet Lib Dem ?
Anniebach the unions may well "pull the financial plug" on the existing Labour Party and then set up a new political wing with existing personal from within its Leading figures at its leadership.
I believe that persons such as Steve Preddy or Steve Taylor among others in the Unite Union would make good leaders of any new political organisation and many other people come to mind from other Trade Unions.
An all new left political organisation with fresh people could have quite an appeal if Britain leaving the European Union turns sour over the next few years.
grandad43 do you ever speak for yourself or under orders to only speak for Unions ?
Anniebach is right about the disappearance of traditional workers. My understanding is that Unite has about a million members, but Unison is slightly bigger. I was once a member of Unison. Most of the members were relatively low paid local government workers in "white collar" jobs. We had very little in common with Unite members.
Callistemon I'm not a LP member, but I do read the online versions of the Mirror as well as the Guardian and any other newspapers (not just British ones) which are currently free.
This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion
Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.