Being retired, I had the opportunity to listen to hours of impeachment testimony during the actual hearings. If you can be as patient as I was, please bear with me and draw your own conclusion:
First article of Impeachment: Soliciting foreign aid to investigate a US citizen for personal gain
Claim: That Trump's request was innocent ('perfect') because there was no 'quid pro quo'.
Official telephone transcripts record an unequivocal request for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens. Joseph Biden is Trump's strongest political rival in the upcoming 2020 election.
Claim: That there was no 'quid pro quo' (conditions attached in exchange for a Biden investigation).
Fact: The tax payer funded Military aid to Ukraine had already been vetted and approved by the State Dept. when July 26th phone call with Zelensky happened. After the Zelensky call, the Military aid to Ukraine was suddenly canceled by Trump without any explanation and without going through proper channels...likewise he later cancelled the official (long scheduled) White House meeting with Zelensky .
Fact: British American, Dr. Fiona Hill of US Foreign Service, testified she had been forced to juggle two conflicting directives; her official role which was to further National Security in the Ukraine and abroad and that she was instead directed to pursue a second unofficial one (headed by Trumps personal lawyer, Rudy Guiliani) which according to Dr Hill amounted to nothing more than a domestic errand driven by the President's own personal agenda which was to continue pushing the Biden investigation in order to discredit Joseph Biden.
At some point (can't recall if it was Dr. Hill or someone else who testified) it was mentioned that Trump would be satisfied if Ukraine President announce publicly, at official White House Meeting, that there would be an investigation into the Bidens. That it didn't matter to Trump for them to actually investigate, only that Zelensky make the public announcement during Zelensky's (much desired) White House meeting.
Claim: That impeachment is baseless and based only on 'hearsay' because Democrats have an agenda and they hate the President
Fact: Initially, some of the testimony was indeed based on hearsay....other testimony was based on irrefutable facts.
Fact: After the whistle blower came forward and Trump realized he was in trouble, he released the Military aid and he gave a press conference stating that it was a perfect phone call, that there was no 'quid pro quo' and that Zelensky should do the 'right thing'.
Impeachment article number two - Obstruction of justice
Fact: Numerous Documents and Witnesses were subpoenaed in anticipation of impeachment hearings. White House (under presidents orders) has repeatedly denied access to documents and witnesses have been prevented from testifying.
Fact: Some key witnesses who can confirm most of the 'so called' hearsay (Morrison and Bolton come to mind among others), were prevented from testifying by the White House and we have now learned, they will also be prevented from testifying at the Senate hearings.
As one Democrat stated: If the President's own men are not being allowed to defend him under oath, then how can we believe he's innocent ?
Dr. Hill also testified that the Russians were working successfully to change the narrative that they had meddled in the 2016 election and to make it look like it was Ukraine. They are also claiming Hillary's email server was hacked by Ukrainians.
There is so much more going on here that I hope someone will be able to write a book when all is said and done. I happen to think he's guilty ten times over (if it walks and quacks like a duck......), I also agree with many of you that the system is so broken and corrupt, I fear he will get away with all of this and with Putin's thumbprint is all over it...every decision Trump makes benefits Putin (reversing policy on Venezuela, removing troops from Syria, and meddling in 2016 US election among others.