I am afraid this is going to controversial Anniebach, but so might Philip have been sentenced for that car crash if he hadn't been who he was. A normal man has just received 6 months for hurting someone in his car when he should have known better than to be driving. In Philip's case I think it's been acknowledged since that his vision was no longer good enough to drive on public roads, and in the other man's case he was a bit tired when he got into the car. 6 months versus "not in the public interest". Anyway they were both accidents, not condemning either of them. Just saying that criticism of public figures and repeating things we read in the tabloids and even choosing to believe them is in the scope of this section.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
