Laurence Fox has resonated with some, simply because we now live in an age where certain thoughts and opinions cannot be expressed. Universities are an example. In more tolerant times it would have been the norm for say Germaine Greer to be invited as a guest speaker, put forward her stance on what is thought by some, as a controversial stance on sexual identity and debate it. Now the argument is simply shut down. In other scenarios if you happen to be white, male even a biological woman, depending on the context, those groups are synononymous with privilege and as such shouldn't have an input.
However, it seems that LF has now gone into "run away train mode" popping up all over the place, can't help feeling these appearances are fueled by his vociferous critics with their "you are a white privileged male so shut up"
I certainly don't agree with everything he makes pronouncements on, in particular the references to the "Sikh" presence in the "1917" film. There are many historical accounts of the active roles Commonwealth soldiers played in both world wars.
US troops forced to act on the ground?
x million
his father-in-law was a famous golfer, according to my husband and he'd know. All good I'd say, just glad he's found his niche, after a lifetime of 

