Which is why it commands such a large space in the media.
In other words, it's not so small minded or demeaning a subject as you inferred.
Or indeed bitchy.
Getting it right, by which I mean a royal wearing a popular item of clothing, is actually tightly woven (excuse choice of word) to peoples livelyhoods, whether they be manufacturers in the 3rd world or designers here in the west.
It could be argued that the clothing industry is supported by royal women modelling the next fashion hit.
Again it could be argued that the manufacture of this clothing gives work to an otherwise disenfranchised community.
As 80% of clothing is made by women in Asia.
I would again argue that as part of this collaboration, the royal women are (as is any high profile clothes horse) helping to lift women in the 3rd world out of poverty.
So, I would think that women aiding and abetting the employment of other women would be looked on rather favourably by the Suffragettes.