trisher Mon 09-Mar-20 16:24:55
'Weinstein was widely condemned in the press and on GN before the trial kittylester I just wondered how far your "presumed innocent" beliefs extended?'
--
Hmm. I wonder how far those posters who prefer the ' kangaroo court' method instead of believing in ' presumed innocence' and spoke so robustly / nastily on GN in an accusatory manner over the Westminster Peaodophile Ring accusation believing it was all true or Christopher Jefferies was guilty because he ' looked a wrong un' would go. Lord knows there are plenty of GN posters who should feel ashamed they preferred the Kangaroo Court method, they were proven to be bang out of order, not that they would care.
Using Weinstein as a point to try and say he was guilty and we knew it and relating it to the Priti Patel debacle shows you are ' presuming guilt ' and not even giving ' presumed innocent ' a look in. The Kangarro Court may well be correct and Priti Patel is found guilty as charged but others prefer to follow process and like to understand what information will inevitably be produced to come to their conclusion.
That is what Kitty is saying in my opinion, apologies if I am mistaken Kitty.