MaizieD
^Therefore I agree to a limited extent that any further change of safety legislation should be held in abeyance until at least the second stage of the Enquiry is completed.^
But that was not the rationale behind voting down the amendment, Grandad. The rationale was that the amendment would delay the implementation of safety measures.
(Any further safety requirements arising from the second stage of the Enquiry could be added to the Act by way of statutory instruments)
That may be the case MaizieD. However, I was just stating, what many believe, that we require at the very least the findings of the second stage of the enquiry before any legislation in regard to Grenfell is brought into being.