This, cut & paste, tonight in The a Telegraph by James Crisp who voted Remain:
“The clock is no longer ticking,” said Michel Barnier in Brussels, finally laying to rest a metaphor he never tired of deploying against Britain.
Despite that, and occasional cross words, there is a real sense of respect between Mr Barnier and David Frost.
The two men couldn’t look more different, or think more differently about global power politics, but they share a mental toughness and determination.
There are already those who are carping that the new Brexit trade deal is a poor replacement for EU membership.
This misses the point. From the moment the UK left the EU on January 31, a zero-tariff, zero-quota trade deal was a substantial improvement on the alternative of WTO terms.
It is true that Britain has made some major concessions, notably in fishing, and some sacrifices, such as the loss of the Erasmus + student exchange programme.
But it is also true, as I argue here, that the final shape of the deal is far closer to the Canada plus that Brexiteers wanted, than the vision pushed by the EU.
Britain will have control over access to its waters in five and a half years. The European Court of Justice will have no role in British affairs. Future governments will be able to diverge from EU rules if they accept the consequences on trade with its major trading partner.
This delivers on the promises of the General Election. The deal is not perfect but compromise is in the nature of any agreement.
David Frost made sovereignty the guiding principle of his negotiating strategy, and both sides will claim victory as they begin to sell the deal to their own sides. Both sides will know that with less than a week to no deal, things could have been much worse.”
?