Monday - will you watch....and why?

Didn’t you realise, all points of view are welcome on here Pippamoo, even from those with delusions of superior insight. What else would we do with our evening after all?

Piers Morgan has Thomas on his breakfast show itv tomorrow morning.
The Media fight back.
Very silly pair to awaken the Kraken

Who is Thomas ?

Piers Morgans behaviour on this is beyond creepy.

Thomas Markle.

Well. Just finished untangling The Sun crossword that my husband had messed up.
Have I missed anything? ?

DD found a box set of Yes Minister in a charity shop recently and gave it to us. We watched three episodes this evening. On balance Yes, Minister is a lot wittier but probably didn't make us laugh as much as watching the Oprah interview would have.

do they all really have to curtsey every time hey see the queen or is it a one off? It all sounds very sound of music

Thomas Markle , gosh

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/07/royal-commentators-hoaxed-into-critique-of-meghan-interview-before-seeing-it?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1615156936

This shows that the you tube interviews were a hoax.

-------yawning now and losing interest, putting on jim-jams.

Did I mishear , I was playing Killer Suduko, did Harry say he was trying to educate Charles and William ?

Well that was two hours well spent....?

Two hours of my life I won’t get back.
That arrogant, entitled twit did say he would try to educate his father and his brother. Unbelievable.

So glad I didn’t bother

If I told my husband that I wanted to take my own life he would move heaven and earth to get help.

Why are we surprised he wanted to educate his very sheltered, privileged white family about race?

I gave in and watched. Ugh! Feel rather grubby now.

It was all me me me, as to be expected. Nothing was their fault of course.I think the uk is most definitely better off without them.

Well, that was an hour and a half of my life I won't get back

Harry gave a salutary lesson in how not to build bridges with your family in case anyone needed to know.

What a damn lie, I stopped watching them, put on BBC news,
a reporter quoted Harry, when he was a child he didn’t go out into the countryside on a bike etc, I saw those two boys, playing in fields, fishing, even abseiling a bridge and often ,

MayBee70

From what I’ve heard so far it seems to be more of a problem with the gutter press not the royal family. And, from memory, they don’t comment on untrue stories in them. And other royals don’t have titles etc.

Other Royals have had to put up with dreadful stories in the press for years.
It's very wrong but Meghan was just the latest in a long line. They both seemed to think the Palace can control the press, very naive of them.
The others have just had to learn to ignore it all and get on with the job.

Anniebach yes, I heard that and thought 'untrue!'

I immediately thought of another thread called Daughter's Astonishing Comment that relates to misremembered childhoods.

Gosh it went on a bit
However, come on, no one should be complict in racism
For someone in 'the family 'to ask what colour their child's skin would be is appalling
How sad that a woman asking for help with mental health struggles was denied it
An unnamed member of the royal family, casually pondering about the colour of the skin of their unborn child
Not one person, whoever they are, should put up with this kind of shizz

Meghan seemed to be confused as to who gets the title Prince.
Apparently protocol states that Archie will only become a Prince when Charles becomes King; but Megan (and Harry one presumes) wanted him to have that title from birth. She was really bothered about it and seemed to take it personally and gave the impression that she thought Archie had been singled out and the title was purposely being withheld. She said she was upset because if Archie wasn't a Prince, it meant he wouldn't have security provided for him. In contrast Princess Anne (and I think Prince Edward) whose children can be Princesses/Princes have declined the title for their children, despite the security advantage.