Gransnet forums

News & politics

... and the sleaze goes on ...

(136 Posts)
PippaZ Tue 20-Apr-21 12:55:57

This is the latest email from The Good Law Project

We already knew that Boris Johnson had misled Parliament when he insisted in February 2021 that all COVID contracts were now “on the record”. Now we’ve uncovered a new contract that makes further nonsense of that claim.

In July 2020 Pharmaceuticals Direct Limited was handed a £102.6 million Government PPE contract - without any competition. Though it was awarded the multi-million pound deal to supply face masks last July, Government failed to publish any details relating to the contract until March this year. In fact, it was only after our lawyers wrote to Government about Pharmaceuticals Direct that this lucrative contract was disclosed, long after Boris Johnson claimed all contract details were on the record. The company’s named representative was a man named Samir Jassal.

Samir Jassal is a well-connected figure within the Conservative Party. A two-time Conservative Party parliamentary candidate and former councillor, he has met Boris Johnson on at least three occasions, with the last meeting held in October 2020. According to his LinkedIn profile, he was an adviser in No.10 during David Cameron’s premiership in 2015 and has worked with several other prominent Conservative Party figures, including the Home Secretary Priti Patel and Minister Zac Goldsmith. Jassal has also donated £4,000 to the Conservative Party in recent years.

This £102.6 million contract is not the only one handed to Pharmaceuticals Direct by the Department for Health and Social Care - the firm received an earlier PPE contract in May 2020, worth £28.8 million. Both deals were directly awarded to the firm without any competition.

The High Court has already ruled that Government acted unlawfully by failing to publish details of Covid-related contracts. The appearance of bias in some of these lucrative contracts awarded without competition is cause for even greater concern.

The more details that we uncover on PPE contracts, the more serious the questions that arise. In this case Government's apparent amnesia when it comes to its legal obligations has prevented timely public scrutiny of a multi-million pound direct award to a Tory party member and donor.

We intend to get answers. To hold Government to account and protect public funds, we have sent a pre-action protocol letter initiating legal proceedings.

NotSpaghetti Sat 24-Apr-21 22:26:20

Whitewavemark2

Apparently it was Cummings wat done it.

Leaking to press that is.

Who cares? Not convinced he has left no 10 anyway.

Apparently it wasn’t, wwm2
Not according to Cummings...

Cummings wrote in his blog
The Cabinet Secretary told the PM that the leak was neither me nor the then Director of Communications and that ‘all the evidence definitely leads to Henry Newman and others in that office, I’m just trying to get the communications data to prove it.
The PM was very upset about this. He said to me afterwards, ‘If Newman is confirmed as the leaker then I will have to fire him, and this will cause me very serious problems with Carrie as they’re best friends … [pause] perhaps we could get the Cabinet Secretary to stop the leak inquiry?

NotSpaghetti Sat 24-Apr-21 22:28:30

Interesting that Johnson personally called the papers to blame Cummings though.

All ridiculous.

Sparkling Sun 25-Apr-21 06:33:48

It all needs a clean out

Lucca Sun 25-Apr-21 08:10:25

..

Whitewavemark2 Sun 25-Apr-21 09:48:00

I’ve posted this on the Johnson/Cummings thread, but really it is as well on here.

Sir Edward Lister, who recently resigned from a government post after only 2 months, told The Sunday Times, that Cummings lives in fear of imprisonment because of fraud committed during the Brexit referendum.

I think many of us are aware of this and have been banging on about it for years.

It is time this was thoroughly investigated, the perpetrators dealt with (regardless of who they are) and the whole issue out in the open with justice done. Otherwise we will never move forward as a country.

Pantglas2 Sun 25-Apr-21 13:28:08

Germany has about half our number of deaths per million population and is a comparable country..

Not sure that using Germany as an example of low COVID deaths is that good, given they have a population the size of Turkey and double their deaths!

I think all countries could’ve done better on one or more levels (except maybe anywhere that had no deaths!) when the investigations begin in earnest.

lemongrove Sun 25-Apr-21 14:52:16

Don’t Germany use different criteria for what’s on the death certificate anyway? Many countries don’t use our 28 day Covid
Diagnosis, but simply have say ‘heart failure’ on the certificate.
I wouldn’t trust anything that China says about anything, and India and Brazil etc don’t have reliable fact gathering going on.

Casdon Sun 25-Apr-21 15:11:44

lemongrove Here’s a summary looking at total excess death rates across the world compared with previous years which makes it clearer. According to this Germany has done much better than the UK in terms of total excess deaths in the past year - I don’t think there’s any ambiguity in this, although if anybody knows more please say.
www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-tracker

Pantglas2 Sun 25-Apr-21 15:44:23

That graph made interesting reading Caslon but for some reason it shows Istanbul figures rather than Turkey! Any ideas anyone?

Pantglas2 Sun 25-Apr-21 15:45:42

Apologies. Casdon (autobluddywrongagain ?)

Whitewavemark2 Mon 26-Apr-21 10:07:35

More than £2bn in contracts politically connected to Tories may have come through priority channel, suggests new report
opendemocracy.net

“Systematic and partisan bias”

Whitewavemark2 Mon 26-Apr-21 15:57:52

Peter Kyle MP
@peterkyle
·
24m
We’ve just discovered #Greensill had a Downing Street pass, IT equipment and desk...but no contract or job description.

The culture in Downing Street is a petri dish for corruption.

GrannyGravy13 Mon 26-Apr-21 16:08:12

Whitewavemark2was that when David Cameron was PM?
as Mr.Kyle’s tweet does not make it clear.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 27-Apr-21 08:06:39

Simon Case - the Cabinet Secretary was given a hefty drubbing yesterday when he appeared in front of the select committee yesterday and consistently refused to answer their questions.

Such lack of transparency does not aid Johnson’s cause nor give confidence that the leaks are not based on good evidence.

MaizieD Tue 27-Apr-21 08:15:16

GrannyGravy13

*Whitewavemark2*was that when David Cameron was PM?
as Mr.Kyle’s tweet does not make it clear.

I'm pretty sure that was when Cameron was PM.

GrannyGravy13 Tue 27-Apr-21 08:26:37

That is what I thought MaizieD

Whitewavemark2 Tue 27-Apr-21 08:40:21

Kylie didn’t say.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 27-Apr-21 18:26:55

This month brought us the alarming sight of Boris Johnson hijacking a taxpayer-funded Downing Street press conference – intended to provide the public with a vital COVID-19 update – to attack one of his political opponents.

And over the last few weeks, we’ve seen a worrying new trend of Government videos and social media content being misappropriated to advance Conservative Party political messaging. And, we believe, the costs of both are coming out of the public purse, not the party coffers.

Several recent Government videos carry the distinct look and feel of a party political broadcast, brandishing the Tory electoral slogan “Build Back Better”, but prominently using the No 10 crest. And when you compare this No 10 branded image alongside the landing page of the Conservative Party website, it’s virtually impossible to distinguish which is Government policy and which is party political campaigning.


Make no mistake, this is Trumpian stuff. Especially when you consider we are now just a few weeks away from the biggest set of local elections on this side of a general election.

It is a legal requirement for Government to have a published policy for how it maintains a clear dividing line between informative communications, which can be properly funded by taxpayers, and electoral material, which is governed by strict campaign finance rules. Otherwise, those in power could simply divert the resources of the state to hold onto power.

Worryingly, our lawyers have been unable to locate any such policy about ensuring Government communications are not used deliberately, or inadvertently, for party political campaigning. And so far Government has chosen to ignore our requests to provide us with a copy.

This issue goes to the very heart of our democracy. We cannot allow this misuse of state resources to go unchallenged. We have issued the first step in formal legal proceedings. Our Pre-Action Protocol letter can be found here.

The case will be crowdfunded. If you’re in a position to donate to the legal challenge, you can do so here: www.crowdjustice.com/case/feathering-party-nest/

Whitewavemark2 Tue 27-Apr-21 18:27:52

That post was copied from The Good Law Project

Kali2 Tue 27-Apr-21 21:29:11

Sleaze sounds quite of 'cute' - why use this term for what is, in real terms, multiple counts of pure FRAUD.

Grany Wed 28-Apr-21 09:06:14

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew has gone into business with a former Coutts banker who quit in disgrace over allegations of sexual harassment. They used a rare company structure to avoid filing public accounts.
@GeorgeGreenwood
& me on on
@thetimes
frontpage

Whitewavemark2 Wed 28-Apr-21 09:14:43

Grany

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew has gone into business with a former Coutts banker who quit in disgrace over allegations of sexual harassment. They used a rare company structure to avoid filing public accounts.
@GeorgeGreenwood
& me on on
@thetimes
frontpage

Yes saw that but this really ought to go onto a RF thread.

There is a suggestion that Windsor set up the company before he was given the boot which would have been wrong.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 28-Apr-21 09:22:01

Whitewavemark2

Grany

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew has gone into business with a former Coutts banker who quit in disgrace over allegations of sexual harassment. They used a rare company structure to avoid filing public accounts.
@GeorgeGreenwood
& me on on
@thetimes
frontpage

Yes saw that but this really ought to go onto a RF thread.

There is a suggestion that Windsor set up the company before he was given the boot which would have been wrong.

Companies House will have a record of when the Limited Company was initially set up as the records are open to the public as will be the accounts (which have to be submitted yearly by law)

Lucca Wed 28-Apr-21 09:25:47

Re the flat improvements

Whitewavemark2 Wed 28-Apr-21 09:28:36

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2

Grany

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew has gone into business with a former Coutts banker who quit in disgrace over allegations of sexual harassment. They used a rare company structure to avoid filing public accounts.
@GeorgeGreenwood
& me on on
@thetimes
frontpage

Yes saw that but this really ought to go onto a RF thread.

There is a suggestion that Windsor set up the company before he was given the boot which would have been wrong.

Companies House will have a record of when the Limited Company was initially set up as the records are open to the public as will be the accounts (which have to be submitted yearly by law)

Not sure that is correct, they have used a weird company structure which avoids filing accounts etc.