Alegrias1
Yes, it was necessary. The way people refer to Harry and Meghan on here is despicable. And William and Catherine are lauded as paragons of everything that should be praised in Royals. So my reference to Saint William is intended to shame those GNers who can't see that both of Diana's children were damaged by her treatment at the hands of the press and that the secular sanctification of one of those brothers, and the demonisation of the other, is grossly unfair.
I feel for them both and the sooner we get rid of this outdated worship of the "right kind" of royal, the better.
Easier just to say Saint William.
I think all on here appreciate what it did to both those boys. William has proven his worth to the British people, has remained dignified through all the victim hood of his baby brother, put yourself in his shoes. How would you react if a sibling of yours demeaned and lambasted your family, in public, when H&M said they left the UK for privacy, ha ha, well they’ve done that well haven’t they. William has no recourse to answering back , but hopefully and carefully, has done in private. Though I guess Harry will spill that sooner or later.