Gransnet forums

News & politics

“Recollections may vary”. Harry and Meghan (again - I know!)

(508 Posts)
MawBe Thu 19-Aug-21 07:36:38

This may be a pot shot too far, now they seem to be including the Queen in their self- righteous whingeing.
(Not that I am biased)
Apparently Duke and Duchess of Sussex believe the Queen failed to take “full ownership” of the race allegations made in their interview with Oprah Winfrey, according to the authors of the unauthorised biography Finding Freedom.
A “friend of the couple” (unnamed, of course) has apparently told Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand that the Queen’s lack of action had prevented the Duke and Duchess from moving on from the claims.
The source also suggested that the Queen’s assertion that “recollections may vary” had not gone down well.
(It did however rank IMHO as one of HM’s all-time greatest bons mots )
The Queen has until now been one of the only senior members of the Royal family to escape the Sussexes’ criticism, but this new epilogue to Finding Freedom, published in People magazine in the US, suggests that the Duke and Duchess feel frustrated that the Duke’s grandmother did not follow through with her promise to address their concerns.
It says: “The Queen’s ‘recollections may vary’ comment ‘did not go unnoticed’ by the couple, who a close source said were ‘not surprised’ that full ownership was not taken
Just one question, if this book is “unauthorised”, does it or does it not reflect their views? Or is it an example of letting somebody else put words in their mouths so that they can deny them afterwards if necessary? All these “unnamed friends,” and “close sources” - aye, right.

Grany Sat 02-Oct-21 11:32:28

The Queen is privately funding the Duke of York’s legal fight against sex abuse allegations to the tune of millions of pounds, the Telegraph understands.

Prince Andrew, 61, last week expanded his American legal team, hiring Melissa Lerner,a Princeton and Columbia graduate, to work alongside lead counsel Andrew Brettler.
Both work for Lavley Singer, a renowned Los Angeles-based law firm reputed for its ability to make celebrities' legal problems “go away” - and commanding the fees to do so.

Mr Brettler is thought to be charging the Duke around $2,000 an hour, while Ms Lerner’s appointment, their junior staff and his UK-based legal team, led by criminal defence solicitor Gary Bloxsome, have already sent his bills soaring.

Her Majesty, 95, agreed to pay for her son’s defence at the beginning of last year, shortly after his disastrous Newsnight interview, in which he failed to show any empathy for Jeffrey Epstein's victims or regret over their friendship

The Duke returned to Windsor on Thursday after spending the last few weeks at Balmoral, the Queen’s Aberdeenshire estate, where he is thought to have kept his mother updated on the case during private lunches.

He has until October 29 to respond to the lawsuit and the next hearing is scheduled for November 3.

Anniebach Sat 02-Oct-21 12:24:44

Then not ‘privately ‘because the Telegraph understands !

‘Mr Brettler is thought to be’

‘Where he is thought to have kept his mother updated ‘

Smileless2012 Sat 02-Oct-21 12:45:22

My thoughts too Annie and I think I'd want a more discreet team if I were the Queen. Not sure why her paying PA's defence costs is news worthyconfused

Is anyone surprised?

Anniebach Sat 02-Oct-21 13:22:27

Smileless. why oh why not facts. Only fact in Grany’s post
is Andrew spent a few weeks at Balmoral

Grany Sat 02-Oct-21 17:25:35

Queen the Head of State pays for her son to escape justice

Smileless2012 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:37:57

No, Queen the Head of State pays for her son's defence and there wont be many mothers who wouldn't do the same and who wouldn't believe in their son's innocence.

That may be miss placed of course but some of us don't believe in a kangaroo court and would rather wait for the judicial process to come to a decision.

On another issue. it's being suggested that Harry will be naming the 'racist' in the RF to appease the publishers for his $15 million book deal.

Is there nothing he wont do for money; apparently not.

Anniebach Sat 02-Oct-21 17:40:25

Grany did the Queen or the law firm announce publicly who was paying ? Link please

Grandpanow Sat 02-Oct-21 17:44:41

It’s interesting so many of you find it upsetting that Harry would name someone who made a racist comment about an unborn child, but are unconcerned that the comment was made….

Smileless2012 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:50:58

I'm not unconcerned that the comment was made Grandpanow but would like to know the context in which it was said. It may or may not have been intended to be racist and taking into account the false accusations that were made in that 'interview', there's no certainty that a) a comment was made and b) if it was intentionally racist.

Anniebach Sat 02-Oct-21 18:12:54

Grandpanow. We do not know a racist comment was made.

grannypiper Sat 02-Oct-21 18:19:02

Grandpanow wondering how dark an unborn baby's skin will be is not racist, it is a question often asked even when both parents are black.

Grany Sat 02-Oct-21 18:38:38

In the context of RF it is racist PP was known for it and queen mother and princess Alexander.

queen exempted herself from race discrimination laws for four decades and law still exists today.

In film the queen has banned shows their easy life she was heard saying about a governor looked like a gorilla.

Josianne Sat 02-Oct-21 18:42:56

Siena Elizabeth are pretty names.

Peasblossom Sat 02-Oct-21 18:46:28

It was an aide who told the Queen that an ambassador she was about to meet was “a gorilla”.

He was a white, gangly American with an unfortunate gait.

In assuming he was black rather shows your racist tendencies I’m afraid.

Grany Sat 02-Oct-21 18:52:11

Peasblossom

It was an aide who told the Queen that an ambassador she was about to meet was “a gorilla”.

He was a white, gangly American with an unfortunate gait.

In assuming he was black rather shows your racist tendencies I’m afraid.

In the film about the RF which queen banned. You can hear her talking to PP and Charles that the man looked like a gorilla I can show you a clip of the banned film from Republic YouTube channel to prove it actually.

lemsip Sat 02-Oct-21 19:12:17

Yes, Beatrice's baby girl is Sienna Elizabeth. a very pretty combination...... and a much better topic.

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 19:18:06

lemsip

Yes, Beatrice's baby girl is Sienna Elizabeth. a very pretty combination...... and a much better topic.

Yes, let's talk about baby names, much nicer than discussing how the queen can be rude about people.

Josianne Sat 02-Oct-21 19:24:02

lemsip

Yes, Beatrice's baby girl is Sienna Elizabeth. a very pretty combination...... and a much better topic.

Yes, lemsip.
I noticed the spelling is Siena with one n like the town in Italy. Maybe her husband has links to it?

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 19:29:15

From Beatrice's tweet about the baby. Maybe she got it wrong.

We are delighted to share that we have named our daughter Sienna Elizabeth Mapelli Mozzi.

2 n's

Josianne Sat 02-Oct-21 19:34:37

Alegrias1

From Beatrice's tweet about the baby. Maybe she got it wrong.

We are delighted to share that we have named our daughter Sienna Elizabeth Mapelli Mozzi.

2 n's

Oh that's good. The more "common" spelling will be better for her at school.

Jabberwok Sat 02-Oct-21 19:53:46

Who is Princess Alexander? If you mean Princess Alexandra , then I for one have never understood her to be racist, or utter a racist comment. In fact as she is so rarely in the public eye, she doesn't utters much at all .

Peasblossom Sat 02-Oct-21 19:56:03

Grany, I do actually remember the film from when it was first shown. The whole film with Prince Edward hitting the cello when the string broke and hit him and numerous other scenes. Maybe I am a bit older than you.

The Queen relayed to members of her family a time when she was receiving ambassadors and her aide had lent over before the entrance of the next one and murmured “The next ones a gorilla” The Queen then went on to say how difficult it was to kept a dignified demeanour when the ambassador entered and did indeed make her think of a gorilla.

As I say it was the American an ambassador who was white. Actress perhaps for her to recounted it in the film but your assumption that it was racist just shows that you equated gorilla to black. So you made the racist assumption.

People who live in glass houses ?

Peasblossom Sat 02-Oct-21 19:56:45

Tactless not actress

Grandpanow Sat 02-Oct-21 20:10:23

@Smileless2012, then it will be good for the person who made the comment to be named and have a chance to explain the context. Better yet he/she should come forward. If the comment was badly made, own up to it. If not, explain. If there was truly no comment made, then Harry can name the person and the person can sue.

Lincslass Sat 02-Oct-21 20:20:34

Grany

Peasblossom

It was an aide who told the Queen that an ambassador she was about to meet was “a gorilla”.

He was a white, gangly American with an unfortunate gait.

In assuming he was black rather shows your racist tendencies I’m afraid.

In the film about the RF which queen banned. You can hear her talking to PP and Charles that the man looked like a gorilla I can show you a clip of the banned film from Republic YouTube channel to prove it actually.

Well bully for you. Honestly my niece, yes niece, wondered if her baby’s skin would be light or dark, would they take after his daddy or her, wondered what colour baby’s eyes would be. Nothing racist whatsoever, just people being curious. Don’t tell me you never wondered what colour hair eyes etc your family’s baby’s would be. Want to know what real racism is, talk to my family member when he went to live outside his home country.