Trump was 'better at foreign policy' because he was prepared to deals with tyrants, to their benefit and to the detriment of their people.
To whose benefit, other than the Taliban, deal with them? Certainly not the women of Afghanistan, all those who hoped for a an open and free society. I fTrump had cared that much, he would have done not just more but far far more to deal with that countries endemic corruption, which would have done more to get support for the government than anything. Corruption is of course a touchy subject for Trump.
America is on the decline as an international player, it is no longer interested in policing the world, that age eended with perestroika. It is now an inward looking country with no interest in anywhere else. With an ocean on each side, Canada to the north and only the slimmest bridge of land linking it to South America, it has no reason to care about anywhere but itself.
The fact that the successful Democratic candidate for the Presidency was such a weak candidate, but could still beat Trump tells you more about the decline of the USA than anything else. No one of any quality wants to do what is necessary to lead either of the prejudiced and corrupt main parties and the electorate do not care much either.
Cut the moorings and let the USA sink into oblivion.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
So what if Trump was in charge? ** Title edited by GNHQ**
(79 Posts)Here's an interesting question. Would we have this utterly appalling mess in Afghanistan if Trump had been re-elected?
How would he have handled it, better than Biden?
Biden said that America will not forgive or forget those horrendous killings yesterday, and they (America) will ‘hunt them down.’ I’m wondering how he thinks they will do that as obviously they are withdrawing from Afghanistan.
maddyone
Biden said that America will not forgive or forget those horrendous killings yesterday, and they (America) will ‘hunt them down.’ I’m wondering how he thinks they will do that as obviously they are withdrawing from Afghanistan.
I think they'll just go back in. American's won't forgive their personnel being killed.
Interesting article from the Washington Post (if you can access it, only a limited amount of 'free' articles allowed)
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/26/robert-kagan-afghanistan-americans-forget/
Maizie I had dismissed that as a solution as I know Biden has long wanted to withdraw from Afghanistan, but you might be right because unless they go back in I don’t see how they can hunt anyone down.
MaizieD
maddyone
Biden said that America will not forgive or forget those horrendous killings yesterday, and they (America) will ‘hunt them down.’ I’m wondering how he thinks they will do that as obviously they are withdrawing from Afghanistan.
I think they'll just go back in. American's won't forgive their personnel being killed.
They’ll bomb the crap out of someone. Just hope they get the right someone. They are not a country you want to cross, they will get their revenge. First they will choose someone to focus on like they did before with Bin Laden. Won’t matter who, just some figurehead..
I think you all think that the US is much less further down the slippery slope than it is.
If we get some decent candidates for both parties in the next election, I will beleive the decline can be stopped. Yes, thebUS can run a few bombng raids, but its refusal to get involved with Syria and Libya, other than from the air and some money tells us all we need to know about the Yanks.
I don't think he is weak M0nica. I think the contrast between those who use unsubstantiated tropes and those who take their time to think things through does not make the first "strong" and the second "weak". If anything it is more likely to be the reverse. Unreflective people, those who want an instant and unsubstantiated opinion on everything, will probably see the first as strong and the second as weak though. Our media, who have become more and more like those reporting on a reality TV programme, are much to blame.
I would agree with your first two paragraphs, and I would agree to some extent with your third.
My above post was in reply to M0nica Fri 27-Aug-21 12:55:19
PippaZ Iwas looking at the subject holisiticsally. Where were the candidates for the Presidency of the strength and quality of George Bush, Reagon, Kennedy, even Nixon, some were crooks, but they were all men of quality and conviction.
What have the Americans chosen and voted for recently? A fantasist and narcissist, and someone whose solution to the results of a terrible war the Americans should never have started, is just to turn on his heal and leave those who suffered as a result of the war, to suffer even more withput even a glance over his shoulder. I doubt if even Obama could have been so indifferent to non-Americans.
What I'm interested in is the mixed message from Biden's press conference yesterday.
Obviously they are continuing with their mission to leave Afghanistan and I doubt that's going to change.
However, what's this comment about?
Know this; We will not forgive. We will not forget. We will hunt you down and make you pay
So how are they going to hunt anyone down if there are no troops on the ground?
American friends who were thrilled to see Biden elected are devastated right now. He's not the man they thought he was.
Zoejory Bombs and drones and rhetoric.
MaizieD
Interesting article from the Washington Post (if you can access it, only a limited amount of 'free' articles allowed)
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/26/robert-kagan-afghanistan-americans-forget/
Interesting article and, it seems to me, an accurate reflection. It reminds me that the US did not enter WWII until they were hit on their own territory by the attack on Pearl Harbour.
Taking a step back - this cycle had been going on in Afghanistan for the last forty years. It seems to be imagined that, somehow or another, Afghanistan will in time become a place where democracy and equality will flourish. I heard a reporter who had been in Kabul for many years (who did a great brief analysis of situation) describe the most likely outcome, and best case scenario, to be one of ‘managed savagery’. Chilling, but apposite?
Maiziethank you for the link, it’s certainly a very interesting article, and worth the read.
M0nica
Zoejory Bombs and drones and rhetoric.
Yes, I think you're right, MOnica. It's all rather frightening.
Taking a step back - this cycle had been going on in Afghanistan for the last forty years.
A lot longer than that, SaraC. There was an Anglo-Afghan war in the 1830s/40s.
A chaplain wrote this in 1843 ... it could have been written yesterday
a war begun for no wise purpose, carried on with a strange mixture of rashness and timidity, brought to a close after suffering and disaster, without much glory attached either to the government which directed, or the great body of troops which waged it. Not one benefit, political or military, was acquired with this war. Our eventual evacuation of the country resembled the retreat of an army defeated”
M0nica
PippaZ Iwas looking at the subject holisiticsally. Where were the candidates for the Presidency of the strength and quality of George Bush, Reagon, Kennedy, even Nixon, some were crooks, but they were all men of quality and conviction.
What have the Americans chosen and voted for recently? A fantasist and narcissist, and someone whose solution to the results of a terrible war the Americans should never have started, is just to turn on his heal and leave those who suffered as a result of the war, to suffer even more withput even a glance over his shoulder. I doubt if even Obama could have been so indifferent to non-Americans.
I do see where you are coming from and I am sure there is something in what you say. Perhaps the next question is to ask why it has changed. It would probably be worth doing a bit of research on what was said about your examples before and during their Presidency.
We have to remember that the US didn't go into Afghanistan to bring about regime change. As Maizie's article points out, they only go out of their own country in retribution for harm done on American soil. Having said that, I can't think of a time when a country did bring about regime change successfully. It seems you can make the environment available to move faster but you cannot just superimpose a change.
Not a word from the Vice President, Harris. I wonder what she thinks?
I once travelled with a friend who turned out to be the most erratic driver I’ve ever known and resolved never to get into a car with him ever again. He rode a bicycle in the same way. Never had an accident in his life though because people steered well clear of him. I likened Trump’s foreign policy to my friends driving. When you have a world leader with a questionable mentality the rest of the world treads very carefully.
Gwyneth
Not a word from the Vice President, Harris. I wonder what she thinks?
I think she is in Asia somewhere (Vietnam?) at a LGBTQ conference
MayBee70
I once travelled with a friend who turned out to be the most erratic driver I’ve ever known and resolved never to get into a car with him ever again. He rode a bicycle in the same way. Never had an accident in his life though because people steered well clear of him. I likened Trump’s foreign policy to my friends driving. When you have a world leader with a questionable mentality the rest of the world treads very carefully.
Very true.
It was a relief when Trump finally quit the White House wasn’t it!
On the first part of your post, we have a cycle rider like your friend in our village, and yes, everything on the road steers well clear of him.
GrannyGravy13
Gwyneth
Not a word from the Vice President, Harris. I wonder what she thinks?
I think she is in Asia somewhere (Vietnam?) at a LGBTQ conference
I used to follow her on Facebook. A couple of days ago she posted that they had made the right decision.
I don't follow her any more.
So how are they going to hunt anyone down if there are no troops on the ground?
They usually do it with drones. Amazes me how they can track down individuals this way but they do and it just creates more hatred and ultimately more terrorism.
It’s easy to be an armchair general I know, but surely if they had sent many more troops and air cover this evacuation could have been organised so much better. They could have kept the Taliban out of Kabul long enough surely?
Also once the US leave our boys are sitting ducks.
A lot of it is just empty rhetoric - talking about hunting down but doing FA.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

