I voted Leave twice, once in 1975 and again in 2016. I agree that some people voted for irrelevant reasons but on both sides. I stayed with my 1975 decision because I remained sceptical that a future United States of Europe will work well, economically and politically, and because I thought it wrong to commit future generations to a Union from which it would be impossible to break free. It comes down to sovereignty which some think a 'nebulous concept' but I regard as something people take for granted until it is gone when it can become the most compelling issue. I understand that people disagree but I regret that this fundamental issue was not central to the argument in 2016 and many Remainers voted Remain without giving it a second thought. The derision heaped on people like myself by some Remainers, supposedly tolerant, outward-looking, intelligent people, is ironic, divisive and very sad. None of us know whether a United States of Europe will work well or not. People used to point to the United States of America as a reference point but there have been massive inequalities in growth of individual US states for decades which ultimately was reflected in their very controversial political choice in 2016.
I have thought about this issue for 50 years and been open to persuasion; but I have never been convinced. Sadly, the Remain campaign not try to convince us about the merits of being a fully-fledged USE but relied mainly on Project Fear (which I did not ignore) and divisive stereotyping of Remainers as open and tolerant and Leavers as old, stupid, gullible and racist.
I will leave it there and leave you to decide on the basis of what I have written whether I deserve to be stereotyped in this insidious and inaccurate manner.