And the latest phone.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
You really could not make this up. Yesterday, the day on which Universal Credit cuts were implemented, Conservative MP Peter Bottomley, complained of the 'desperation' MPs faced by having to live on this meagre salary. 
I work in a full-time unpaid job 'desperately' trying to plug the gaps created by the effects of austerity cuts implemented by Peter Bottomley's government.
A couple who are aged over 25 receive Universal Credit at the rate of £7,158.96 a year (that's per couple, not each).
And the latest phone.
And shops at Waitrose
It's hard, backbreaking work and badly paid but someone has to do it.
At least my Civil Service pension went up this year 
By 0.5%
He shouldn't have had so many children if he couldn't afford to support them.
JaneJudge
He shouldn't have had so many children if he couldn't afford to support them.
Yes, three children. That is disgraceful.
But spare a thought - he's 77 and still having to work.
that will be because of all the speeding tickets
It's hard work.
youtu.be/6JpH-Jgenpo
That's how DH watches tv.
If I sneak the controls and turn over he says 'Hey, I was watching that!'.
Do you remember the guy on Question Time who said he could not be in the top 5% of incomes.
He said "“I’d like to call out Labour as liars,” he told Burgon. The man said he was “not even in the top 50%” and claimed that every doctor, accountant, solicitor in the country earned at least £80,000. The the top 5% “don’t even work because they’re rich – they’re not employees,” he added."
He had got the top 5% of salaries and the top 5% of incomes muddled up.
It made me wonder how many people thing "everyone" earns the same or near to their income?
(That story always reinforces my view that all incomes (and assumed incomes) should be taxed as if they were incomes. I think that man on over £80,000 might well agree.
Callistemon
JaneJudge
He shouldn't have had so many children if he couldn't afford to support them.
Yes, three children. That is disgraceful.
But spare a thought - he's 77 and still having to work.
There's loads of which need picking.
metro.co.uk/2016/03/14/conservative-mp-planned-to-put-pensioners-to-work-picking-fruit-5752178/
Yes, I do remember him Pippa. It always amazes me that people in the top decile or so think they're so poor.
‘After all, they may be a bit slower doing the work. I’ve thought of that too. I think we might arrange to exempt British pensioners from the minimum-wage laws, to allow them to do this work.’
What a cheek! A bit slower indeed. Well, perhaps I might be slower but I am still a good aim with a rotten tomato.
they ought to just heat one room to cut their energy bills and maybe he could wear an extra cardigan
Ooops! I meant to write that there's loads of fruit which needs picking.
growstuff
Rosie51
growstuff The vast majority of footballers don't get paid the mega-salaries of the elite players.
Maybe not but they're on very good wages, even the 3rd and 4th tiers, and they earn far more than their european counterparts.
www.onaverage.co.uk/money-averages/average-premier-league-salary
What is the average salary in other English professional football leagues?
The difference in salary between the Premier League and lower leagues is very big. In the Championship the average salary is between £7,500 and £8,500 a week. The top players in the Championship can earn around £80,000 a week. The average salary in League One is between £1,700 and £2,500, and in League Two it’s between £1,300 and £1,500.
Not exactly peanuts even for the lowest division. Doesn't change the fact that it absolutely can't be a grim struggle on £80,000+ per year.the average salary of a Premier League football player is about £50,000 per week. This average is high partially due to (the fact) that some of the top players earn up to £350,000!
And that's only for Premier League players. What about all the other professional players, who play for lower leagues and non-League sides?
As the article points out the "average" is £50,000 because it's distorted by a handful who earn six figure salaries.
I taught a boy who now plays for a Premier League club and I wouldn't mind betting he worked and trained harder during his teenage years than any MP. He's a workhorse, not a mega-star and I doubt if he'll still be playing when he's in his thirties, so I hope he's thought ahead and made plans. Maybe he could be an MP!
Well from the link I gave the lowest average for the 4th tier gives a yearly salary of £67,600. That's still well above the average salary. Ballet dancers will have worked and trained to ridiculous levels during their teenage years, maybe even harder than your workhorse, but they'll not receive anything like the same pay. If he's not Premier league standard in his thirties he can do what lots of footballers have done, drop down the leagues and then get work outside football. It does exist!
grrr. last para should read all incomes from assetts (and assumed incomes from assetts) should be taxed as if they were incomes.
I shall stop trying to do two things at once [smile
Was Peter Bottomley’s remark on the radio/tv / newspaper / tweet or was it a leaked ‘personal comment?’
If the former then an insensitive thing to say, however much he feels that he is hard done by with his salary.
It’s true that an MP’s salary isn’t great with all the responsibility/ aggro that goes with the job.Some years ago it was decided that an independent body would oversee the salary increases for MP’s, which seemed to award them more than when increases were secured in Parliament.It was hoped that it would put an end to excessive claims.
It was during an interview it was said.
lemon the comments were made in an interview to The New Statesman and reported thus:
While Bottomley no longer suffers the financial strains, he believes the situation is “desperately difficult” for his newer colleagues. “I don’t know how they manage. It’s really grim.”
Bottomley's remark was in an interview with the New Statesman.
To be fair, he didn't say it was difficult for him to live on it, but that new MPs found it "desperately difficult" and that he didn't know "how they manage. Its really grim".
He also thinks someone working as a good (?) teacher, social worker or Union official would struggle to come to terms with such a reduced salary because they would be significantly worse off.

cross post grannyactivist, Miss A
When MPs salaries are compared with those at the higher echelons of the private sector, and even the public sector, it is claimed they are insignificant.
For example, in 2019, the Head of the Metropolitan Police earned £278,563. Likewise, a quarter of Head Teachers at secondary schools were reported to earn over £100,000.
It is argued that the comparatively lower salary of politicians is likely to deter high calibre workers from entering the political field.
www.politics.co.uk/reference/mps-salary
(I Googled, there could be more up-to-date accurate information.)
How do the salaries compare with those of other countries?
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.