TopsyIrene I have tried to make the point that there is no need to travel so far and make a terrifying journey across the channel in flimsy craft. Migrants have often travelled through several European countries where they could claim asylum. Nobody with a shred of compassion would try to prevent people from drowning - you have to be a rather 'special' person to even think of preventing the RNLI from doing their job, but why is it that people find it necessary to put themselves in such danger? Desperate people yes - but why push your life to the limits trying to cross fifteen miles of icy water in an overcrowded unsafe boat? Are our benefits really so good that they are worth dying for? I am also very concerned about what happens to people when they arrive. Other posters have said that we don't have the infrastructure to cope with thousands of people who are probably ill, traumatised, and have needs beyond that which we can provide, even for our current population. Waving the compassion flag is all very well - but unless we pay a great deal more into our public services, they cannot cope.
National treasures. Who would you choose?
What was dental care like in your childhood ?


