varian
Do none of you find the very notion that North Shropshire is a "safe seat" a negation of democracy?
It implies that no-one there or in any other safe seat, who disagrees with the sitting party, can ever vote in a way that matters?
If you think that your vote will never count, why vote?
First Past The Post is an obscenely undemocratic electoral system. It needs to go if the UK is not to become the last undemocratic country in Europe.
If you think that your vote will never count, why vote?
Possibly one of the reasons why so many people say, when asked / interviewed things like "well what's the point" or "it doesn't make any difference". And why many of the young can't be bothered to vote.
When you think about it, the Referendum got people out of their apathy - disregarding the result - they got out and voted because they knew it would make a difference - no?
I understand the pro's and cons of both PR and FPTP, but when you consider that a majority of seats does not mean that the majority of people support a party in government, it does seem immoral and undemocratic.
So what are people supposed to do? Our system means a repeat of the same old, same old, leaving people to just not bother to vote - or to take to the streets if they care enough. Our system is one of discord, adversary and aggression - is it any wonder that each party "plays politics" - it's in the nature of the beast.
Maybe that's one of the reasons we're such a divided nation - partisanship means there's no desire to work together, no consensus on what's best for the country as a whole. So we end up with the two major parties slugging it out with each other in the House - and the rest of the electorate doing the same with each other.