It was considered at the time, by MI5 and Mrs May, to be a huge risk to the UK. It is so much more so now!
Good Morning Saturday 9th May 2026
How did you vote and why today
So while our government is debating on what constitutes a party, how many parties may have been held a couple of years ago, there's a terrible threat to world peace going on at the edge of Europe. Anybody else noticed?
It was considered at the time, by MI5 and Mrs May, to be a huge risk to the UK. It is so much more so now!
the UK currently has only 1 out of 6 destroyers active and 6 out of 12 frigates. That means only 1 of 2 aircraft carriers can be used as there is not enough escort vessels to protect them. A sad state of affairs, and Putin and the world know this, of course.
Russia playing “ war games “ in the lrish sea
Right about where data cables are that connect us with
America…….
“Is it any surprise that observers in Washington have had to re-evaluate their post-Brexit assumptions of British foreign policy? They see in London a refreshingly like-minded assessment of what is happening, and what is needed to deal with Putin.
This situation requires not timidity but boldness. That is what gains respect in Washington and unease in Moscow. It is not just about deterring Putin from invading Ukraine, but showing him and other potentially belligerent world leaders that the West will not just roll over at the first sight of aggression. Unfortunately, too many of our allies do not understand this simple fact”
Richard Kemp is a former infantry commander and chairman of the Cobra Intelligence Group
Good post Urms. DH and I have huge respect for Richard Kemp.
Maybe boldness would work if the U.K. had a leader that was respected worldwide but I can’t see that being the case when we have a leader that is regarded as a joke by other countries.
It is hugely worrying that we have such unstable bordering on psychopaths in charge, and that the UK is becoming hugely involved.
Thursday 10th February 2022
4 nuclear capable B52s arrived at USAF Fairford - see what else departed and arrived today - ominous signs people......
UPDATED 15:20
Departures
Departed 06:58 80-10?? U2S BLACK01 U.S. Air Force
Departed 10:36 85-0001 C5M RCH436 U.S. Air Force
Departed 10:43 68-10329 U2S DRAGON21 U.S. Air Force
Arrivals
Arrived 06:51 85-0001 C5M RCH436 U.S. Air Force
Arrived 11:30 61-0039 B52H HATE14 U.S. Air Force
Arrived 14:05 60-0044 B52H HATE13 U.S. Air Force
Arrived 14:56 61-0018 B52H HATE12 U.S. Air Force
Arrived 15:15 61-0003 B52H HATE11 U.S. Air Force
VISITORS
60-0044 B52H 'Excalibur'
61-0003 B52H 'Old Ironsides III'
61-0018 B52H 'Night Train'
61-0039 B52H 'The Warrior'
80-1066 U2S 9thRW
80-1069 U2S 9thRW
80-1080 U2S 9thRW
And that is just at one of the many airbases.
Kali2 have you heard of the phrase.
fail to prepare, prepare to fail
Aircraft with nuclear capabilities fly in and out of bases around the world every day.
It’s not the flights that you can track that you need to worry about…
GG13- if this war kicks in, there will be NO winners- we will all fail. You don't get this, do you?
But do tell us about the flights we should worry about, as you are in the know.
Kali2
GG13- if this war kicks in, there will be NO winners- we will all fail. You don't get this, do you?
Kali2 Oh I certainly get this probably more so than some,
having an AC who is a serving Officer in the Armed Forces.
U.K. & USA citizens have been advised to leave Ukrainian, according to the defence minister James Heapey.
He then went on to say that the U.K. will not send in military aircraft to evacuate them as this could exacerbate the situation.
I like Mr.Heapey he comes across as very knowledgeable and on top of his brief
Borrowed from a friend elsewhere
''They don´t need to have the bombs in the UK, and they don´t need the B52 to deliver them. The Generic "dial a yield" B61´s fit on the hard points of the Tornado and the Eurofighter just fine.
Thing is MAD no longer applies when both or all sides consider a limited exchange viable and NATO has no policy of "no first use" also the B61 is not the earth ending megaton nuke, that alone makes it´s use likely when the conflict starts to go badly. ,,
What is unfolding will debunk once and for all the myth that the EU has been instrumental in securing peace. The main players like Germany and France are showing no leadership and precious little unity.
Biden has done nothing but cluelessly appease Putin. The appeasement coupled with the uncoordinated and shocking abandonment of Afghanistan and the U.S. allies on the ground there is what has brought us here.
U.S. media warned Trump would be a war monger so Trump tried to prove the opposite by commencing the end of the Afghanistan involvement. Biden rolled this forward in a shockingly-clumsy fashion. Highly incompetent, and this sent a signal to our adversaries.
The reversal of the Trump sanctions on the Nord Stream contractors coupled with the foolish in-person meetings with Putin allowed Putin to truly realize how just how mentally and philosophically crippled Western Leadership had become. Putin already knew European leaders wouldn’t stand up.
The problem is the weather is not cooperating and Putin is beginning to realize something has changed in the Ukrainian people. A sense of unity has developed - patriotism even - and if Putin doesn’t achieve total control immediately, the mud is going to be the least of his worries.
And why oh why do you think that is?
Do you understand the concept of MAD, and now the new more recent concept of 'limited viable nuclear exchange'?
If things escalate, what would happen would be nothing like any war we have ever known.
As said before, I have been a member of CND since the beginning- and like most members, have always known that MAD would only protect us for so long. And that the concept of 'viable limited nuclear exchange' has now put an end to MAD as originally thought.
Anyone who understands this would not wish to get involved headlong in a war where there would be no winners, let alone protect the Ukraine.
Kali2
And why oh why do you think that is?
Do you understand the concept of MAD, and now the new more recent concept of 'limited viable nuclear exchange'?
If things escalate, what would happen would be nothing like any war we have ever known.
As said before, I have been a member of CND since the beginning- and like most members, have always known that MAD would only protect us for so long. And that the concept of 'viable limited nuclear exchange' has now put an end to MAD as originally thought.
Anyone who understands this would not wish to get involved headlong in a war where there would be no winners, let alone protect the Ukraine.
So the West should just put its feet up and let Mr. Putin invade Ukraine?
If you think he would stop there, I am afraid you are delusional.
Did I say this?
And yet, can you understand what the alternative could be? Putin is using this, he is playing with us like a dangerous psychopath.
Who is delusional here? Are you telling me that you are not concerned about escalation?
Anyone who understands this would not wish to get involved headlong in a war where there would be no winners, let alone protect Ukraine ?
If this does not mean blindly letting Mr.Putin invade Russia Kali2 perhaps you could please explain what you actually meant.
The West has no need to put boots on the ground in Ukraine, warfare has moved on considerably since the WW2.
Indeed, and that is exactly the issue.
Do you believe 'the West' could win a 'limited' nuclear attack on Russia. Really? And that they would not retaliate.
www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-04/news/uk-increase-cap-nuclear-warhead-stockpile
This very scenario has been forecast by CND from the very early days of nuclear weapons. And even more so, since smaller weapons have introduced to total folly of 'a limited and winnable nuclear strike'.
Kali2
Indeed, and that is exactly the issue.
Do you believe 'the West' could win a 'limited' nuclear attack on Russia. Really? And that they would not retaliate.
www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-04/news/uk-increase-cap-nuclear-warhead-stockpile
The only person talking about a nuclear attack is you Kali2
I have not heard one reference on radio or tv news to this.
Urmstongran
What is unfolding will debunk once and for all the myth that the EU has been instrumental in securing peace. The main players like Germany and France are showing no leadership and precious little unity.
I assume you realise that the German constitution only allows Germany to be involved in NATO and UN missions. The UK is a member of both. Germany is severely limited in its ability to go to war on its own (for understandable reasons). There is no EU army.
Callistemon21
GrannyGravy13
Kali2
Johnson and Truss are not going to Ukraine to speak on behalf or for the European Union.
Of course they are not, they are going as part of NATO.
So much misinformation being repeated on threads.
If it was anti vaccination propaganda GNHQ would delete it.
Yes NATO!!!
What part of N.A.T.O. is difficult to understand?
I agree.
Members of NATO have to work together. Johnson and Truss went without approval of NATO, and were not representing NATO.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.