You’re right of course Aveline but Oz got slated for Nauru. It was seen as a ‘deterrent’. Sending a message to say ‘you can’t just queue jump and rock up’.
Immigration is a toxic subject. Europe is destabilising. Look at the Paris suburbs. No wonder Le Pen is gaining traction on the issue (although Macron will still win. The French moan, demonstrate, burn tyres, then vote for the continuity candidate).
This from the Guardian - October 2020:
“For any offshore processing scheme to be lawful, the human rights and protection needs of all asylum seekers, refugees and migrants who encounter it must be respected. This includes procedures to identify – case by case – whether people will be at risk of persecution or other serious harm in the country where the centre is located (or in any other place to which that country might send them). This can be very time-consuming and resource-intensive. EU experience shows that it can take longer for a transfer decision to be made than for a substantive asylum claim to be considered.”
Fair point.
So WHY are our civil servants not dealing with issuing asylum claims MUCH faster?
The whole thing has become a joke. I think Boris is hoping the first Army plane over to Rwanda is reported upon extensively and that migrants in the UK text their mates saying ‘don’t bother’.
The French MUST know the people trafficker’s M.O. The dinghies have to be sourced from Belgium or wherever. It’s a complex and highly lucrative business operation making millions of euros for the awful cocky people who run it. They must be feeling pretty invincible, getting away with it month after prosperous month.
So, Labour, the Church, The UN don’t like Boris’ proposals? Okay.
What DO they propose instead?
How did you vote and why today



