Are these "wannabe women" really that nervous of biological women that they have to try and intimidate them??
I don't know about nervous, but TRAs hate women. That's what's been behind their politics all along. We got it 'too good' for their misogynist brains, even though for most of us 'too good' meant working full time, doing most of the childcare and home-making, but still earning 25% less, and (for young women at least) being expected to look good and conform to pornstar standards in bed. They are threatened by the fact that despite everything many women are still capable of competing with them, and even becoming their boss. That upsets their world view, so they want us back where we belong. Breeders, 'home makers', or maybe having a little job to pay for housekeeping so they can keep more of their wages for beer money.
If there is no such thing as a woman, there is no need for anti-discrimination policies so we'll start moving backwards at work, no need for safe spaces, so more of us will stay at home. We won't be able to point to meaningful research to show that we are getting a raw deal when it comes to pensions, housing etc, as transwomen will be grouped in with us in statistics, and even our traditional role as mothers will be open to people who can't give birth on account of being men. It's horrible, and frightening, and we (in general, not on this thread) are sleepwalking into Dystopia because many have been tricked into thinking that dissent is equivalent to discrimination against 'the most vulnerable group in society' which is errant nonsense.
Their campaigns are clearly orchestrated, as you see the same cliches, false equivalencies and spurious arguments trotted out whenever there is a 'debate' (which they tried but failed to disallow altogether):
Feminists are 'Nazis'. This from a bunch of bullies who dress as ninjas and block a feminist meeting, hanging a noose around the neck of a statue of a feminist icon.
We are 'out of date', and the New Improved 'intersectional' feminism (which buys into TRA politics) is the feminism of the future. Yeah, right - it's a 'feminism' that doesn't centre actual, real, biological women ?. It (and its supporters) puts the rights of men ahead of those of women, in the name of equality.
We are not 'being kind'. 'Being kind' is a concept that is used to silence women when we get above ourselves by voicing an opinion, and is linked for many people with the Caroline Fleck being hounded to death by nasty comments online. So the (false) equivalence is that if you speak out against being eradicated you are a troll or a bully.
We are being discriminatory by complaining when men muscle in (literally and figuratively) into women's sport. Tell that to the women who have spent years training to get to the top in their sport, only to lose out to someone who is physically stronger because of their male biology. Oh, and if we insist on getting uppity and complaining, we are also racist, as a black woman with a sex hormone imbalance would suffer if rules were brought in to govern the ratio of oestrogen to testosterone allowed for each class.
We don't stand to lose anything by giving our rights to men. Ok, so we lose the right to be called women, as only men can do that - we are cis women, or natal women, or breeders etc. We lose the right to feel safe in hospital, or to be safe from rape in prison - but you know, we can solve that by widening the legal definition of rape, so that's that one dealt with. We lose the right to choose who touches us intimately, but we just need to lighten up and stop being 'obsessed by penises'. What does it matter if the bloke with his hand inside us is 100% male and our religion or personal boundaries makes us deeply uncomfortable with that, so we'd asked for a woman? He's wearing a badge with a female pronoun, so that means he's a woman, obviously.
There's more, but it all appears on every platform where a TRA is sounding off.