Gransnet forums

News & politics

Boris Back by Christmas! ?

(305 Posts)
FannyCornforth Sun 04-Sept-22 11:55:38

The plotting to get shut of Truss of is already underway.
But the good news is that it could lead to a General Election
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-leadership-challenge-vote-b2159270.html?amp

Petera Wed 07-Sept-22 19:58:29

If it's not seethrough then somone has drawn a a picture of underwear on the outside - which in these times I don't discount as a possibilty.

Nearly every comment on the feed is asking the same question.

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 19:50:41

See through?

varian Wed 07-Sept-22 19:39:49

We've all heard of the emperor's new clothes ( which only his besotted fans could see) but I've never heard of the emporer's wife wearing see through clothes which make her look like a hostess in a dubious nightclub.

twitter.com/ThatTimWalker/status/1567056359002181635?t=zpPHQn8DjCnriFfBbF5SSA&s=09

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 07-Sept-22 14:45:38

I’m looking forward to seeing whether she has any mettle - and I’m a Conservative voter.

Stormystar Wed 07-Sept-22 13:57:10

I'm looking forward to seeing Truss showing her mettle and wish her well in these difficult chaotic times. I loved Carries dress, Liz dresses more in a leadership style, but what their clothes have to do with their political acumen is beyond me, are we living in 2022 or 1922

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 13:42:35

MaizieD

Callistemon21

Probably.

Although Liz might be quite worn out with all that time spent campaigning.

Oh, no, she has a lot to sort out, no time for a holiday.

Oh, you were expecting an invitation for the new PM?

I thought you were talking about the nation's top scrounger couple...

Both, MaizieD!

But I expect HM decided, very sensibly, that neither should get an invitation to stay and spoil her break.

Barmeyoldbat Wed 07-Sept-22 13:35:09

Yes I know GG§w but I read it somewhere recently that they had a choice, in person or by letter and most did it by letter

Daddima Wed 07-Sept-22 13:04:40

Didn’t anyone else think it odd to see the Queen in her skirt and cardigan combo, rather than her usual silk dress? I know that is probably her Balmoral holiday wear, I just thought it strange.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 07-Sept-22 12:52:11

Barmeyoldbat

Most PM s have handed in their resignation by letter but as I said before it’s one last jolly for them, at tax payers expense

Previous MPs on resigning see the Queen at Buckingham Palace, Windsor on at least one occasion.

This time it was decided due to HM’s mobility problems that the outgoing and incoming PMs should travel to Balmoral.

Both Mr.Johnson and Ms.Truss took their spouses.

MaizieD Wed 07-Sept-22 12:18:53

Callistemon21

Probably.

Although Liz might be quite worn out with all that time spent campaigning.

Oh, no, she has a lot to sort out, no time for a holiday.

Oh, you were expecting an invitation for the new PM?

I thought you were talking about the nation's top scrounger couple...

Glorianny Wed 07-Sept-22 11:47:44

Some media sources are saying the dress was a deliberate choice the brand Harmur are renowned for the back view of their designs. It was a message from Carrie. I thought it was lovely and she does have a different style to the usual MPs wife

FannyCornforth Wed 07-Sept-22 11:43:15

It’s PMQ’s shortly…

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 11:39:36

Probably.

Although Liz might be quite worn out with all that time spent campaigning.

Oh, no, she has a lot to sort out, no time for a holiday.

MaizieD Wed 07-Sept-22 11:35:31

Callistemon21

The Prime Minister and spouse are usually invited for a holiday to Balmoral in the summer recess so they have missed out this year.

One going out, another coming in, was there even an invitation to lunch this year?

Perhaps the Queen thought that two holidays in 6 weeks was quite enough and they didn't need another one grin

Barmeyoldbat Wed 07-Sept-22 11:33:32

Most PM s have handed in their resignation by letter but as I said before it’s one last jolly for them, at tax payers expense

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 11:33:05

The Prime Minister and spouse are usually invited for a holiday to Balmoral in the summer recess so they have missed out this year.

One going out, another coming in, was there even an invitation to lunch this year?

MaizieD Wed 07-Sept-22 11:23:25

Many moons ago ladies were not allowed to show their ankles, always wore gloves (even whilst dining), thank heavens we have moved on.

I'm sure that it's still not thought to be OK to be showing your knickers in public, though.

Why was Mrs J going to Balmoral, anyway? Is it usual for resigning PMs to be accompanied by their spouses when offering their resignation to the Queen?

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 11:12:08

Grannynannywanny

I’m sure I heard my late Mum’s voice yesterday morning saying “That girl should have a vest on, she’ll catch her death of cold at Balmoral dressed like that !

???

Oh yes, mothers and vests!

Callistemon21 Wed 07-Sept-22 11:11:34

FannyCornforth

It did look rather celebratory ?

Perhaps she was celebrating!!

And perhaps she changed on the plane or wore a jacket over it to see the Queen.

HM likes bright colours too.

icanhandthemback Wed 07-Sept-22 11:06:51

Fleurpepper

The etiquette regarding what is appropriate when meeting the Queen, especially on official visits, is quite clear.

Yes, the dress is beautiful,yes she carried it very well. Not appropriate is clear. Anyone who has attended an official function with the Queen, and not even as the PM's spouse, will tell you that it is all made very clear in advance.

I am sure if the Palace had thought it was entirely inappropriate, somebody would have had a quiet word and handed her something to cover up or found her a safety pin!

Grannynannywanny Wed 07-Sept-22 10:36:31

I’m sure I heard my late Mum’s voice yesterday morning saying “That girl should have a vest on, she’ll catch her death of cold at Balmoral dressed like that !

GrannyGravy13 Wed 07-Sept-22 10:29:55

Many moons ago ladies were not allowed to show their ankles, always wore gloves (even whilst dining), thank heavens we have moved on.

HM would not in all probability have caught a glance of Carries back. Fashion and the clothes that we all wear is personal, I prefer not to judge as I would not like to be judged for my choice of clothing.

With all that is going on in the U.K. , aftermath of Mr.Johnson’s premiership along with the crystal ball gazing regarding Ms.Truss’s Government and policies, I have far more pressing things to ponder.

Fleurpepper Wed 07-Sept-22 10:29:34

yes, very see through

And of course totally irrelevant to the OP!

Parsley3 Wed 07-Sept-22 10:21:50

twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1567051322423140353?t=sJRiIn4XosQ8mel5aC9l2g&s=19

At first glance, I thought it was showing her knickers.

Fleurpepper Wed 07-Sept-22 10:17:59

The etiquette regarding what is appropriate when meeting the Queen, especially on official visits, is quite clear.

Yes, the dress is beautiful,yes she carried it very well. Not appropriate is clear. Anyone who has attended an official function with the Queen, and not even as the PM's spouse, will tell you that it is all made very clear in advance.