maddyone
I’m not convinced of the usefulness of these COP conferences. Many countries make big promises and then fail to provide any data or evidence that they’ve actually fulfilled, or even tried to fulfill, their promises. Add to that the number of private planes the delegates use, not to mention big limousines (think America here) and the whole thing becomes a place to meet and greet and appear powerful. Not impressed.
Two things I'd like to say about that maddyone.
The argument that they should stay at home and not contribute to emissions is a red herring. I did a quick calculation last night on here at about 7:30 that shows that COP amounts to about 0.00015% of the annual CO2 emissions of the whole world. We are trying to find a solution and not having a key conference because it would reduce emissions by 0.00015% would be counterproductive.
Also I really think there is a significant misconception about what happens at COP. There are more than 30,000 delegates - 35,000 this year, I think. The promises are part of it, to be sure, but not actually this year because the theme is about how we are progressing in meeting those targets. Whether people like it or not, this conference is about essential international co-operation, and the leaders of the so-called influential nations need to be there to nurture that co-operation. Coffey's not the one for the job, sorry.
I'll ask the question again. If we don't do this, what do we do? Go home and build a big 4m high wall right round the coastline, then keep our fingers crossed?