Gransnet forums

News & politics

Government 20 million advert

(36 Posts)
BlueBelle Tue 27-Dec-22 11:36:49

Am I the only one who feels annoyed and somewhat insulted that the government have spent 20 million on an advert telling us to draw our curtains, use a lower degree for washing the clothes, and generally take care with the fuel we are using
Aren’t we all only too well knowledgable about these ideas and haven’t we all been doing these things for months
Have they ? I wonder ?

PamelaJ1 Sun 01-Jan-23 17:08:06

henetha

Twenty million for telling us the bl***ing obvious!

You would think so but you should hear my mum on the subject!
She spent time with young family this year. 2 grandchildren were having a pyjama day and complained they were cold.
They were. Bit upset that my mum told them to go and put some clothes on😂
They both have university degrees bit lack a bit of commen sense?

Barmeyoldbat Sun 01-Jan-23 17:55:49

For a government that keeps saying it has no money for this that and the other it is a lot. Absolute waste of money

Oreo Sun 01-Jan-23 18:45:27

Am with those who say we need to be told energy tips! Well, certainly some do.
I would have liked to see tv ads style stuff about it so all will see it.
Visited a house over Christmas where most were wearing tshirts and heating turned up high.

M0nica Sun 01-Jan-23 21:31:57

Whatever we may need, too many people are not interested.

There was a report in the Observer today of a results of a research project by Cambridge University. It showed that when people add insulation to their houses, they see an initial reduction in fuel consumption, but within 4 years consumption is up to pre insulation levels.

Presumably because they get lazy, put the thermostat up a degree or two, worry less about having windows open etc etc.

The problem is - that even in the current circumstances - people know what to do but cannot be bothered to do it. You can advertise to people like that day and night for a fortnight, but they still will not listen to the message.

By the way Oreo putting things on tv, does not mean everyone sees it. I watch little or no television, mostly BBC, and tend to leave the room and do something else during any advert breaks. Many older people today do not watch tv. In fact I know very few that do.

Oreo Sun 01-Jan-23 22:34:12

That’s unusual then Monica because far more people watch tv than don’t watch it.
We’re not just talking about older people either, all ages need to know energy saving tips.
Putting it on tv reaches a much bigger audience.

Dickens Sun 01-Jan-23 23:40:15

MaizieD

Just a reminder that (much to people's surprise) Rees Mogg's department was all ready to go with a public energy saving advice campaign in September and Liz Truss vetoed it.

I don't know why everyone is being so sniffy about this initiative. Not everyone has been brought up in money saving households; not everyone follows Martin Lewis; not everyone sees the Which money saving advice etc. Why are posters assuming that because they know what to do everyone should know? It doesn't hurt to spread the information net as widely as possible.

I think that this campaign is better late than never and may be more effective now that people have had a couple of shocking fuel bills.

Just a reminder that (much to people's surprise) Rees Mogg's department was all ready to go with a public energy saving advice campaign in September and Liz Truss vetoed it.

... and his campaign came in cheaper at around £15 million, I believe!
At the time, there was talk about possible black-outs, so as Business Secretary, it made sense for JRM to urge people to cut their usage one way and another - and for households to possibly save up to £300 a year in the process.

But Truss was opposed to the campaign on "ideological" grounds - it was too "interventionist". She was in her free-market economy mode with stilts on - let the chips fall where they may. My contempt for her runs deep... did she think we were all going to save ourselves £300 at the expense of the companies' profits? That was exactly the moment when the government's job was to intervene.

This is the second time in a week that I've defended a Tory politician both of whom I dislike! But credit must be given when it's due.

I think what people are forgetting - or not realising - is that these campaigns have to cater for the lowest common denominator, it's not 'nannying', it's just being pragmatic.

M0nica Mon 02-Jan-23 08:34:04

Oreo I spent 20 or more years visiting older members of my family in care. When I started visiting, blaring tvs were ubiquitous in care homes. By the time I ceased visiting, tvs were rarely on, even in the day room, still less in resident's rooms. Young people are even less likely to watch terrestrial tv.

I do appreciate that most people do watch commercial tv stations, but I am not convinced that putting adverts on tv will get to any more people than having this information online.

The problem is that there are none so blind as those who will not see.

Oreo Mon 02-Jan-23 09:32:41

I don’t think the residents of care homes comes into it really,
As the care home owners and care assistants will be the ones to put any energy saving tops into place.
I think public information tips both online and tv is the way to go, to reach as many as possible.
Only the few who don’t need to save energy because money doesn’t matter much to them, or those who can’t be bothered or some other reason, like mental health issues, wouldn’t take note of any tips.
The house I visited at Christmas was cos they couldn't be bothered.

Oreo Mon 02-Jan-23 09:33:16

Tips not tops😆

M0nica Mon 02-Jan-23 10:13:14

The house I visited at Christmas was cos they couldn't be bothered. This, essentially, is the point I am trying to make.

There are none so blind as those who will not see (or cannot be bothered to see).