M0nica
Contracting out is not the same as privitisation, it does not require any payment by patients.
Vast quantities of the NHS have been corntracted out since the NHS started. It is the way many organisations carry out their businesses. I was very glad that the NHS used private contractors to meet peak demand when I needed a minor operation. It made no difference to me whether the doctor doing the op was in the NHS or in a private hospital, it was all free to me at the point of need.
Contracting out is leading to areas of the NHS becoming privatised. These companies need to make a profit. If profits cannot be met under a free-at-the-point-of-need system, governments of the current extreme will privatise; that is their nature. Full charges plus profit will come directly from us - if you can afford it. My friend, who has had three kidney transplants, would be dead. Why do you close your eyes an whistle where this is concerned? Why not insist we retain free-at-the-point-of-need? Why are you gaining, personally, by allowing the underfunding of our services?