VioletSky
That's not really shown out in discussion as a principle though
A large part of the issue is that criminals have the same rights as the rest of us
Whether that is right or wrong isn't the fault of trans people
If it were my choice I'd say violations of other humans remove human rights. How can it remove the right to literal freedom but not a whole host of other rights?
I think we are getting that wrong
Add in if all prisoners deserve the removal of other rights.. I can see how it's difficult
Thank goodness I'm not in charge of these things
This is pretty much what I was saying upthread, about drug addicts/acoholics who are forced to go without, people not having a sex life, and mothers who have to leave their babies etc. When I said it it was countered with 'whatever you want/need, doodledog', but then you say the same thing a bit later, as though it is something you've just considered.
It's not about point scoring, and of course there is no reason why we can't agree on anything; but what is so annoying is that you set yourself against the rest of us, saying that you are the one who has to tell us how ridiculous we are, and that you can't apologise on behalf of transpeople when nobody asked you to, and generally working from the assumption that you know more and are coming from a higher place than everyone else.
At no point do you appear to recognise that often you counter something in a fact-based post by using exactly the same reasoning, such as when we say that it is a worry that some men will fake being trans to get access to women. Can you really not see that when you argue against that by saying that anyone accessing women's spaces dishonestly is a fake transwoman, it is the same thing? And can you not see how annoying that is?