The only person who has been accused of homophobia on this thread or others is me
No, that is not true. We are constantly reminded of Section 28, and of the 1970s, (despite that being 50 years ago) and how people were phobic about gay people. This has happened over and over on many threads, including ones you've been on, so maybe you only notice insults when they are directed at you?
Comparisons are also made with racism (usually in the civil rights days in the US - another anachronistic and erroneous comparison).
How on earth anyone ever came to that conclusion I don't know but I won't ask what twisted interpretation of my words led there, I don't want to know the person who said it.
Well, the only way you will find out why it was said is by asking the person who said it. Walking away when you hear something you don't like might make life easier, but it's not very good for self-reflection.
But I was young in the 90s and I remember my friends finally standing up and coming out and how beautiful amd freeing that was. I also remember the push back and the absolute awful things people said back then. If any gay person committed any sort of crime it was used against all gay people. People didn't want us in communal changing spaces and public toilets and saw usbas some sort of threat.
I think all of us remember when gay people were demonised. Many of us are able to remember Section 28, and when AIDS was known as the Gay Plague. That doesn't mean that we supported any of it, or that we didn't have gay friends. The law of averages suggests that there will be gay people posting on this thread, and others who define as straight but have had gay experiences. You will not be not alone in that, either.
Now trans people are being held responsible for crimes they did not commit so yes it does remind me of how things were back then and it really shocks me.
No. Transpeople are not being held responsible for crimes they did not commit. What people are saying is that men are committing crimes whilst claiming to be transpeople. That is not the same thing.
As a consequence of the fact that some men fake trans status to gain access to vulnerable women, society can react one of two ways. We can either protect women and insist on sex-based segregation when women are vulnerable, or we can say that the feelings of men who want to be women override concern for female safety. I would prefer the former, as the law exists to protect the innocent.
As every person I've spoken to on this thread has been entirely accepting towards gay people so obviously were accepting back then... I'm just surprised the way trans people are supposed to publicly denounce or apologise for criminal behaviour they aren't responsible for.
I agree.
However, I don't link the two things. What has acceptance of gay people got to do with what anyone expects of trans people? Nothing. It is this insistence on linking views about trans people in the 2020s with views on gay people in the 1970s (which were not even held by those on this thread) that is in question.
Also, it is not specific criminal acts that anyone is asking transpeople to apologise for. You have got the wrong end of that stick, I think. What many would like to see is an admission that there are men who are using the cover of trans status to gain access to women, and to benefit their lives in other ways, eg by having an 'easier' time in a women's jail. Such an admission, and a common-sense, solutions-based approach to dealing with that would go a long way to helping the trans cause.
Trans people are seen as a threat in changing spaces and public bathrooms and gekd responsible for crimes they didnt commit.
No. Transpeople are not seen as responsible for crimes they didn't commit. They are seen as potentially being men who want to access female spaces for sexual gratification. Many identify as 'lesbian males', (aka heterosexual men) and for various reasons a lot of women do not want them in changing spaces and public bathrooms around teenage girls and other women who are physically weaker than they are. In the same way as most non-trans heterosexual men are not a threat to women in changing rooms etc, they should not be allowed in, as there are some of their number who will be dangerous. That is simply equality, and non-discrimination.
I remember how that felt
How what felt? What crimes were you accused of? Obviously you don't need to go into detail, but as you work with children I assume that they weren't sexual in nature? Or that if they were you were completely exonerated. As would most innocent people be.
The comparisons I draw are strong
Again, difficult to comment without knowing what you mean.