Very few live “off grid” but there are plenty that do not contribute to society in a positive way while claiming whatever advantage they can from benefits and/or the black economy.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Who do you believe: Sunak or the IMF?
(206 Posts)The IMF have identified that the UK is the only G7 economy to shrink in 2023, falling behind even Russia.
A leading Tory boss calls Brexit a ‘complete disaster’ and was ‘total lies’ claiming Johnson threw the NHS under the bus.
Today’s business reports include a 4% shrinkage in long-run productivity relative to remaining in the EU, (the Office for Budget Responsibility), inflation and energy prices higher than in the EU, trade has fallen by almost a fifth. Brexit has raised food prices by 6% says the LSE. Yet Sunak tells us to rely on trade deals where we’ve sold our farmers down the river (Australia) and will raise GDP by less than 0.1% a year by 2035! He refers to Freeports as a Brexit advantage, yet UK had 7 Freeports in 1984 and chose to phase them out in 2012!
With business going under due to huge staff vacancies, since we lost many EU employees and key industries like social care and hospitality struggling to cope, future growth will continue to be jeopardised!
Will the May Elections be when this country wakes up and acts?
Some people might walk away from corporate life in their later years and downsize jobs and lifestyle. In doing so, it’s possible to live off savings and take part time work thus enhancing well being and improving personal carbon footprint. Benefits and the black economy do not figure in this change of lifestyle.
A desire to flee the rat race does. Do humans not have their own agency and choices? It helps to have a good pension pot from the corporate world which bled the soul!
Pointlessly arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin (how many people are off grid and pay no tax) can be completely banished.
Here is a link to a paper produced by the House of Commons Library just last month analysing in the smallest detail government sources of revenue and who paid it. Among the other things it shows that the proportion of income tax paid by the top 1% of earners went up from 20% in 1999 to 29% in 20/21.
researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8513/CBP-8513.pdf
ronib
Daisy Anne the civil service currently employs 513,000 people.
I think it’s a pretty high number for this country.
I can see no evidence of the government attempting to destroy the public sector. In fact I thought it was increasing with a vengeance?
So are we now supposed to build our views on a guess from ronib? I don't think so.
Where is that figure from? What does it relate to? Does it include those outsourced, who can earn more than they did in some jobs when they were directly employed, and the company that is employing them is charging a fee? How many do we actually need? I'm not sure your guess that it is a "pretty high number" brings it into the world of facts.
Have you compared this, plus the outsourced, making friends companies a profit, to how many have been employed in the past or to a current needs assessment? What changes have happened to change the need for different types of workers?
Finally, how can we take anyone seriously who thinks just putting a figure out there gives us any idea of the truth?
Daisy Anne I am too busy wading through the report from the House of Commons. My Google search shows 513,000 civil servants in the Uk.
Chill lady google
MaizieD
ronib's failure to recognise any form of taxation apart from income tax is likely to be a result of the media not taking a great deal of interest in any other sort of taxation (and she's obviously never read any of my posts where I point out exactly what you have just done, growstuff
)
This is from the BBC thematic Review that I mentioned yesterday somewhere:
Thinking about a broad definition of impartiality, one question we asked was ‘are people’s diverse interests proportionately represented in BBC coverage?’ There’s no perfect measure of that, but we think we can observe misalignments. What gets talked about can obscure big interests that don’t, bringing risks to impartiality by omission.
^ A striking example is VAT^.
In Wales, more VAT is paid than income tax, ditto North East England. In fact, a large proportion of the whole UK population pays more VAT than income tax. For a great many households across the country, VAT is the biggest tax and so to them you might say the most important. More than one third of UK adults pay no income tax at all, but they do pay VAT.
What determines this is people’s relative income and spending. For high incomes, income tax is likely to dominate; for lower incomes, VAT. That is, these groups have different tax interests. But which tax is more talked about? Which interest is most served by political argument and BBC coverage?
We think income tax knocks VAT out of the park in this respect, meaning the tax interest of the better-off gets more attention.
Asked about this imbalance in the coverage of VAT, many interviewees went silent for a moment, then said things like: ‘Interesting… never really thought about it. Yes.’
P 21
www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/documents/thematic-review-taxation-public-spending-govt-borrowing-debt.pdf
Very interesting Maizie. Thanks for post it.
post posting
Katie59
Very few live “off grid” but there are plenty that do not contribute to society in a positive way while claiming whatever advantage they can from benefits and/or the black economy.
But even they pay tax! (Whoever they are.)
I'm really not sure what you mean by "do not contribute to society in a positive way".
I doubt if anybody is genuinely indispensable, although most people do contribute to society by being good friends or helping other people out. They help economically by being consumers - and almost all consumption is taxed and provides work for others.
Maybe you mean the millions of pensioners in this country. I wouldn't like you to give the government any ideas! 
Casdon
growstuff
Casdon
growstuff
ronib
As usual, the internet gives varying figures… depending on the site. So pretty pointless exercise.
Some fairly ordinary people would really like much less interference in their ordinary lives but that’s really not going to be understood here?It could be because so much public administration has been outsourced, so employees are employed by private companies, but directly funded by the state. Such people are no longer civil servants nor local government employees.
Lies, damned lies and statistics.
Local Government cuts due to government underfunding is the main reason for the reduction in civil servants.Local government employees aren't civil servants, although they might be included in the statistics.
The ICAEW categorise them together, with some rationale, but you are right.
Civil service figures only, which are interesting.
www.civilservant.org.uk/information-numbers.html
I was just thinking that could be a reason why there are discrepancies about the figures.
ronib
MaizieD just an alternative way of life which you have probably not experienced. No insult surely?
What about council tax, road tax, VAT on fuel, phone and non-food consumables? What about the tax the people who provide non-taxable food have already paid and factor into the cost?
It is absolutely wrong to claim that anybody doesn't pay tax.
I doubt it matters whether I believe Sunak or the IMF. What is clear to me is the present Tory government is grossly unsatisfactory across a wide range of issues and needs a long time in the wilderness to rethink. Sunak ought to have gained experience in a junior role before becoming PM. But God help us if Johnson comes back.
513,000 civil servants? Rubbish. Possibly 513,000 people working in the public sector.
What a civil servant is, is defined quite clearly in this link www.civilservant.org.uk/information-definitions.html
To quote from it:
Civil servants are those who are employed by 'the Crown'.
The UK's (unwritten) constitution recognises three independent power bases:
^ Parliament,^
The Executive (that is Government Ministers and Civil Servants)
The Judiciary
Judges, magistrates and those employed by Parliament are thus not civil servants. Nor are the police, the armed forces, and those employed in the National Health Service and by Local Authorities.
Civil servants are usually - but not always - in practice employed by 'Ministers of the Crown' - so most civil servants work in government departments and are therefore employed by Government Ministers.
Civil Service Statistics shows that employment stood at 510,080 headcount and 478,090 on a full-time equivalent basis (FTE) as at 31 March 2022 (NB: see section 2 below for more information on our headline measure for monitoring the changing size of the Civil Service workforce).
Taken from the Govt Statistical Bulletin
growstuff
Katie59
Very few live “off grid” but there are plenty that do not contribute to society in a positive way while claiming whatever advantage they can from benefits and/or the black economy.
But even they pay tax! (Whoever they are.)
Growstuff there is a whole industry in the black market all done in cash, they don’t declare anything or pay VAT, many millions are evaded and that’s excluding the drugs industry.
I’m not sure how you define a civil servant, numbers in the public sector have fallen in recent years from close to 7m to just over 5m due to moving many groups to the private sector.
So the 5m would be those employed directly, administrators, police, fire service, health service, etc etc, split 2/3 central and 1/3 local government
Katie59
growstuff
Katie59
Very few live “off grid” but there are plenty that do not contribute to society in a positive way while claiming whatever advantage they can from benefits and/or the black economy.
But even they pay tax! (Whoever they are.)
Growstuff there is a whole industry in the black market all done in cash, they don’t declare anything or pay VAT, many millions are evaded and that’s excluding the drugs industry.
Yes, I know, but are you you suggesting that these people never pay any tax on anything they do with their money? Don't they pay council tax, buy clothes, eat out, travel anywhere or do anything?
Katie59
I’m not sure how you define a civil servant, numbers in the public sector have fallen in recent years from close to 7m to just over 5m due to moving many groups to the private sector.
So the 5m would be those employed directly, administrators, police, fire service, health service, etc etc, split 2/3 central and 1/3 local government
A civil servant works for the Civil Service and has specific pay and terms and conditions.
Katie59
I’m not sure how you define a civil servant, numbers in the public sector have fallen in recent years from close to 7m to just over 5m due to moving many groups to the private sector.
So the 5m would be those employed directly, administrators, police, fire service, health service, etc etc, split 2/3 central and 1/3 local government
The police, fire service, health service, local government employees are not civil servants.
What is a civil servant?
www.civilservant.org.uk/information-definitions.html#:~:text=Civil%20servants%20are%20those%20who,)%20represents%20the%20Crown%2FState.
growstuff
Katie59
growstuff
Katie59
Very few live “off grid” but there are plenty that do not contribute to society in a positive way while claiming whatever advantage they can from benefits and/or the black economy.
But even they pay tax! (Whoever they are.)
Growstuff there is a whole industry in the black market all done in cash, they don’t declare anything or pay VAT, many millions are evaded and that’s excluding the drugs industry.
Yes, I know, but are you you suggesting that these people never pay any tax on anything they do with their money? Don't they pay council tax, buy clothes, eat out, travel anywhere or do anything?
I can think of groups that probably avoid paying most taxes and would live on takeaways, new clothes would carry some tax and motor fuel.
The Shadow Economy is said to be worth £150bn and might be worth 10% of the whole economy, it’s massive.
I'll take your word for it. I must admit I don't know anybody who lives on take-aways, but they're paying a fortune in tax.
I don't know how anybody avoids paying most taxes, unless they belong to a self-contained group of people who can supply everything cash in hand. Even zero VAT rated food from supermarkets has tax which has been used in the production, supply and retail processes factored into the price.
growstuff
I'll take your word for it. I must admit I don't know anybody who lives on take-aways, but they're paying a fortune in tax.
I don't know how anybody avoids paying most taxes, unless they belong to a self-contained group of people who can supply everything cash in hand. Even zero VAT rated food from supermarkets has tax which has been used in the production, supply and retail processes factored into the price.
Spot on there Growstuff there are several self contained groups or communities that are committed to not paying UK taxes nor the rules we all live by.
I believe this to be true, tho I have only knowing people evidence: and I'm talking people at the bottom of the "heap" not actual figures.
I don't condemn those people as a whole group, some individuals are acting in what is a criminal and damaging way (especially where illegal drugs are involved: others, just trying somehow or other to get by.
Question is, how to approach this? what are the causes? How to reach the desperate "trying to get by's" and lift them out?
Katie59
growstuff
I'll take your word for it. I must admit I don't know anybody who lives on take-aways, but they're paying a fortune in tax.
I don't know how anybody avoids paying most taxes, unless they belong to a self-contained group of people who can supply everything cash in hand. Even zero VAT rated food from supermarkets has tax which has been used in the production, supply and retail processes factored into the price.Spot on there Growstuff there are several self contained groups or communities that are committed to not paying UK taxes nor the rules we all live by.
But you mean income tax! How do they escape other taxes? Are they homeless, never use any form of transport, have any heating, eat or drink anything not zero VAT rated? Do they not use mobile phones or any other technology? Do they run around naked?
I just checked. Income tax accounts for only 24.6% of the revenue the government raises from taxes and other sources.
Almost every single one of us is a taxpayer.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

)