Gransnet forums

News & politics

How did we lose our freedom of speech? Is it irreversible?

(107 Posts)
Veridica Sat 25-Feb-23 23:09:58

The mainstream media seem to have got into the habit of developing the most contentious issues of the day into a narrative which cannot be challenged. Before long this is reinforced by social media, often incubated by virtue signalling so that those who make a challenge face ostracism by their peers.

Having spent most of my working life with adults like Julie Walters in Educating Rita who discovered a thirst for knowledge later in life and never stopped asking questions, I am very shocked and disappointed at the numbers of people who have swallowed recent narratives without question. The truths are starting to emerge but many still get an apathetic response.

Brexit was a disastrous idea, mask wearing was ineffective, lockdowns had a serious impact on health, the "vaccines" were dangerous gene therapy, resulting in huge numbers of adverse effects, the Nordstream pipeline was blown up by the US as part of Biden's proxy war to weaken Russia and there is a huge variation of opinion from experts on global warming. The evidence to support all these issues is now in the public domain but mainstream media is only slowly embracing it and there is a reticence among those who believed the narratives to admit they were wrong. Remember how Ivermectin was ridiculed as a therapy for Covid? There are plenty of peer-reviewed papers now saying just the opposite.

The censuring of huge numbers of experts during Covid is probably the worst example of attacks on freedom of speech and we have a right to ask how the powers that be actually got away with it. Unless the public realises what has been going on, it will only get worse. 1984 was meant to be a warning, not a workshop manual! Can anyone offer some optimism on the subject?

Katie59 Sun 26-Feb-23 19:34:32

Siope

^Climate is changing.^

What we can or should do about it there is massive disagreement

Not at all my area of expertise, so happy to learn different, but my understanding is there is a consensus of opinion amongst scientists on the actions and policies needed - see, for example, the IPCC’s Mitigation of Climate Change report, published in April last year - but reluctance amongst governments to take the necessary actions as quickly as the scientists recommend.

But, as I say, if you have appropriately peer reviewed, creditable resources that prove significant disagreement amongst scientists, happy to be proved wrong.

As I have said on other topics I don’t do “other sources,” what I see is nobody is doing anything other than paying lip service to reducing the effects of climate change.

To be serious we need to do much much more.

Jane71 Sun 26-Feb-23 19:42:59

I'm not sure I fully understand where the OP is coming from, However, I don't believe we have lost our freedom of speech, but I do believe that we should be more sceptical (not cynical) of what we read in the media.

varian Sun 26-Feb-23 19:59:44

Unfortunately the phrase "do your own research" no longer refers to stringent scientific investigation and analysis of peer reviewed papers, but it just means spending hours on the Internet going further and further down rabbit holes where the wldest conspiracy theories hold sway.

welbeck Sun 26-Feb-23 20:02:38

well i'm not a scientist, at all, so i seek advice from those who are, principally dr bharat pankhania, who knows all about infectious diseases.
and lots of other things too; cooking, gardening etc

twitter.com/doctorshaib?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

MerylStreep Sun 26-Feb-23 20:04:00

This is a long read but you don’t have to read it all, just the first two paragraphs. This was written in 2015. It hasn’t got any better since then.

martinhallfacilitation.org/2015/01/08/thought-police-bad-idea/

Veridica Sun 26-Feb-23 20:05:41

Siope

PS: There is no significant variation of opinion. amongst scientists on climate change

Like Covid and the vaccines, there is a narrative that has been agreed upon internationally. You don't have to look further than the World Economic Forum for the source. Their initial experts include Bill Gates (good on computers and expert in making money but suddenly becomes an epidemiologist and then a climatologist) and a Scandinavian teenager with learning difficulties and pushy parents. The WEF members we know well and their totalitarian goals can be achieved by a variety of goals, the restrictions to resolve their "Climate Crisis" being the latest.

There is evidence that the world is warming up but it depends on how you spin it. Unfortunately the climatologists who offer a different view are kept out of mainstream.

I studied climatology as part of my geography degree at Birkbeck College, London. In charge was Prof Kenneth Hare, one of the first to identify global warming. He didn't see it as apocalyptic and pointed out that there were positives, like new areas becoming cultivable. We learned about palaeoclimate eg Cheshire was once a desert and only a few hundred thousand year ago LA was frozen. We are in an interglacial so therefore temperatures will rise. Then there is solar activity, changes in the earth's tilt, changes in the oceans and so on. We only have data from a short period and nowhere enough to do accurate modelling. (Unless you ask Neil Ferguson).

The real issues are pollution, especially plastics, conservation and recycling. Here it gets mucky as there is money involved and plenty of opportunity to make or lose fortunes so once again the corporations try run the show and silence any challenges, whilst at the same time trying to frighten the public into behaving the way they want them to. We just have to stay wary and research beyond the mainstream. I do honestly believe global warming is an issue but not a crisis and something we can learn to live with if we listen to the scientists and keep the politicians at arm's length.

Veridica Sun 26-Feb-23 20:32:00

Riverwalk

^Please do me a favour by meeting me half way and looking up: YouTube Dr John Campbell^

Campbell, who by the way is a nurse not a medical doctor, has been discussed on here for the past three years - he's not new to us.

Call me old fashioned but I prefer lessons on pandemics from the world's epidemiologists not 'Dr John'.

Nothing wrong with being old fashioned. You'll frequently catch me listening to singer songwriters from the '60s! The great thing was that they were inquisitive, passionate and happy to challenge what was going on. Some of it was nonsense but it felt we were moving forward. I feel we now live in a world where people aren't too bothered about being manipulated.

As far as John Campbell is concerned I get the idea that a narrative has been decided elsewhere on this forum that his work should be dismissed, which is really disappointing. I didn't agree with him initially but I appreciated his professionalism and attention to detail. Then things changed. His dogged pursuit of data led him to discover that the media, public bodies and drug companies are not telling the truth. All his videos are based on publicly available data, otherwise he would be taken down.

His qualifications and experience are enormous and he has written some highly respected books on physiology that are used widely in the medical profession. Anyone who denigrates his qualifications compared to doctors who gained their title through medical school could be accused of looking for an excuse to put him down because they don't want to face up to what he is saying. Harold Shipman was a "real" doctor, wasn't he?

Veridica Sun 26-Feb-23 20:42:19

varian

Unfortunately the phrase "do your own research" no longer refers to stringent scientific investigation and analysis of peer reviewed papers, but it just means spending hours on the Internet going further and further down rabbit holes where the wldest conspiracy theories hold sway.

I think it's up to us to decide whether what we read makes sense or not but at least if you make the effort you are bound to get a wider appreciation of the subject. Some people have a track record of being completely honkers and I can't imagine spending any time on what David Icke for example has to say!

However, remember Donald Trump? Yes, the mention of his name makes me cringe as well but he was right about Ivermectin and Hunter Biden and if he had disbanded NATO we may have had more chance of a peaceful solution in the Ukraine, so perhaps not to be too dismissive.

Katie59 Sun 26-Feb-23 20:49:18

Jane71

I'm not sure I fully understand where the OP is coming from, However, I don't believe we have lost our freedom of speech, but I do believe that we should be more sceptical (not cynical) of what we read in the media.

Sceptical and cynical, because there are so many activists who have a blatant agenda and are publishing biased information. Which leads to politicians changing policy for purely political gain, because it seems popular.

Deedaa Sun 26-Feb-23 20:50:54

Veridica I will exercise my freedom of speech by disagreeing with everything you have said. Can't resist pointing out that most doctors aren't "real" doctors because they haven't got a PhD. For most of them Doctor is a courtesy title. My daughter has got a PhD and has been involved in research for nearly 30 years. I tend to get my information from her and from a doctor who spent 2020 on a Covid ward and assures us that Covid was like nothing she had seen in her previous long career and was certainly nothing like normal flu.

GrammyGrammy Sun 26-Feb-23 20:55:04

Botanist David Bellamy was cancelled for not believing in man made Climate Change. Mike Yeadon was cancelled for being against the Convid jabs. Endless people get disappeared from being able to freely communicate with the world because of their views. Many, many of them experts in their field. Freedom to hear the Truth? It's disappearing fast.

Siope Sun 26-Feb-23 21:15:24

You’re confusing ‘cancelled’ with ‘discredited for being wrong’.

welbeck Sun 26-Feb-23 21:31:07

Trump was not right about ivermectin as a treatment for covid; isn't it for horse-worming ?

welbeck Sun 26-Feb-23 21:36:32

mobile.twitter.com/Azeem_Majeed/status/1439992522441433092

Katie59 Mon 27-Feb-23 00:06:20

welbeck

Trump was not right about ivermectin as a treatment for covid; isn't it for horse-worming ?

Ivermectin is used for many animals as well as humans for various parasitic diseases, however Covid is a most unlikely to be cured.

M0nica Mon 27-Feb-23 06:49:21

One of the reasons I so frequently give links is so that other people can see where I get my information and can judge it themselves.

ronib Mon 27-Feb-23 07:06:58

The scientific community has definitely researched the benefits or not of Ivermectin. A quick chat with a stranger in a restaurant, who had been successfully treated with Ivermectin for Covid, made more of an impression as to its efficacy. Basically it worked but unavailable in UK and bought from Spain.

Veridica Mon 27-Feb-23 08:49:00

DaisyAnne

Interesting first ever post on GN, Veridica. It seems to be intended to undermine all that governments every decide to do. Do you not like democracy?

Democracy is about freedom of speech. The present government has been caught out on so many lies that it's impossible to trust them. When there is a subject (let's take Covid and the vaccines as the most current and contentious) where the truth can be derived from the government's own and publicly available figures, you would expect national media to turn the numbers into facts. The facts can then determine policies to make the country a better place. BUT they are either ignoring them or trying to explain them away.

When qualified people offer a different version, they are stamped on. I urge everyone to check out Prof. Norman Fenton's analysis of the Covid and vaccine data. He is based at Queen Mary University, London and very highly regarded as a statistician. Down the road at Imperial, Neil Ferguson who has made countless errors in the past and was responsible for the horrendously inaccurate and terrifying forecasts of the effects of Covid, is still suffering no comeback for his incompetence. His conclusions suited governments across the world to see how far they could control their populations by lockdowns and mandates-and it worked! Many people have woken up to the fact that their democracy is slipping away but unless more question what is going on, it will happen again, and get worse!

Hetty58 Mon 27-Feb-23 08:58:56

Veridica, C minus - find out what research actually is, develop study skills, check your 'facts' and try again. Your ramble reminds me of some efforts I had to read and mark when I was teaching.

Riverwalk Mon 27-Feb-23 09:03:58

His conclusions suited governments across the world to see how far they could control their populations by lockdowns and mandates-and it worked!

Given the diversity of political systems of the nations that locked down (most nations of the world) that would mean there was some sort of 'hive mind' and a global conspiracy.

ronib Mon 27-Feb-23 09:20:17

Riverwalk maybe have a look at the role the World Health Organisation plays in public health policy and practices? You raise an interesting point.

Hetty58 Mon 27-Feb-23 09:24:22

I've heard it all a hundred times, that all consuming conviction that, somehow, every government in the world are out to control our minds (and probably implant microchips too) destroy our freedom and turn us into zombies. Stop, think - ask why would they want to do that? How could they possibly do that? Then consider whether you have fallen victim to the mass paranoia scam - born in the USA of course. (Oh dear, we've obviously failed dramatically as educators.)

DaisyAnne Mon 27-Feb-23 11:42:43

Veridica

DaisyAnne

Interesting first ever post on GN, Veridica. It seems to be intended to undermine all that governments every decide to do. Do you not like democracy?

Democracy is about freedom of speech. The present government has been caught out on so many lies that it's impossible to trust them. When there is a subject (let's take Covid and the vaccines as the most current and contentious) where the truth can be derived from the government's own and publicly available figures, you would expect national media to turn the numbers into facts. The facts can then determine policies to make the country a better place. BUT they are either ignoring them or trying to explain them away.

When qualified people offer a different version, they are stamped on. I urge everyone to check out Prof. Norman Fenton's analysis of the Covid and vaccine data. He is based at Queen Mary University, London and very highly regarded as a statistician. Down the road at Imperial, Neil Ferguson who has made countless errors in the past and was responsible for the horrendously inaccurate and terrifying forecasts of the effects of Covid, is still suffering no comeback for his incompetence. His conclusions suited governments across the world to see how far they could control their populations by lockdowns and mandates-and it worked! Many people have woken up to the fact that their democracy is slipping away but unless more question what is going on, it will happen again, and get worse!

Freedom of speech, while an underlying principle of democracy, is not unlimited.

I wonder if you are American. It seems many are misled these days into thinking our laws are the same as those in the USA. They are not (thankfully).

I am not, by the way, interested in those who use social media to disseminate lies and propaganda, so let's not "take Covid and the vaccines". However, general discussion and the ability to question your own beliefs are always okay.

TerriBull Mon 27-Feb-23 11:54:58

When I read about the protesting Canadian truckers being locked out of their bank accounts, albeit temporarily, I was shocked that could happen in a democratic country.

Not an anti vaxxer I've had 4 now and my husband 5, when he was having his last one, I could help thinking really! really! aren't we being over vaccinated here. I think people's concerns should be discussed and listened to. For example, one of my sons was telling me a doctor in the States was shut down when he discussed the raised risk of myocarditis in a demographic of young men. My son refused to have a booster when these concerns were raised having lost his half brother to cardiomyopathy and possibly as a result has a heightened awareness of heart related conditions.

MayBee70 Mon 27-Feb-23 11:59:31

Veridica

Riverwalk

Please do me a favour by meeting me half way and looking up: YouTube Dr John Campbell

Campbell, who by the way is a nurse not a medical doctor, has been discussed on here for the past three years - he's not new to us.

Call me old fashioned but I prefer lessons on pandemics from the world's epidemiologists not 'Dr John'.

Nothing wrong with being old fashioned. You'll frequently catch me listening to singer songwriters from the '60s! The great thing was that they were inquisitive, passionate and happy to challenge what was going on. Some of it was nonsense but it felt we were moving forward. I feel we now live in a world where people aren't too bothered about being manipulated.

As far as John Campbell is concerned I get the idea that a narrative has been decided elsewhere on this forum that his work should be dismissed, which is really disappointing. I didn't agree with him initially but I appreciated his professionalism and attention to detail. Then things changed. His dogged pursuit of data led him to discover that the media, public bodies and drug companies are not telling the truth. All his videos are based on publicly available data, otherwise he would be taken down.

His qualifications and experience are enormous and he has written some highly respected books on physiology that are used widely in the medical profession. Anyone who denigrates his qualifications compared to doctors who gained their title through medical school could be accused of looking for an excuse to put him down because they don't want to face up to what he is saying. Harold Shipman was a "real" doctor, wasn't he?

Dr John Campbell got me through the pandemic with his advice. Right from the start of January 2020 I listened to his blog every day. We started taking VitD etc. In no way was he, at that time, anti vaccine, anti mask or anti lockdown. In fact he advised people to wear masks. However, last year he suddenly became an anti vacc’er and I stopped listening to him. His blogs are now full of conspiracy theories and at least one of the people he used to chat to ( the lady doctor from Australia) has distanced herself from him. I now prefer to listen to people like Tim Spector and the MedCram podcasts, neither of which advise people to not have the vaccine. It saddens me to say this as I was very grateful for his advice throughout most of the pandemic, but I think he’s completely lost the plot these days and is quite dangerous. I think his celebrity status has gone to his head.