Gransnet forums

News & politics

How did we lose our freedom of speech? Is it irreversible?

(107 Posts)
Veridica Sat 25-Feb-23 23:09:58

The mainstream media seem to have got into the habit of developing the most contentious issues of the day into a narrative which cannot be challenged. Before long this is reinforced by social media, often incubated by virtue signalling so that those who make a challenge face ostracism by their peers.

Having spent most of my working life with adults like Julie Walters in Educating Rita who discovered a thirst for knowledge later in life and never stopped asking questions, I am very shocked and disappointed at the numbers of people who have swallowed recent narratives without question. The truths are starting to emerge but many still get an apathetic response.

Brexit was a disastrous idea, mask wearing was ineffective, lockdowns had a serious impact on health, the "vaccines" were dangerous gene therapy, resulting in huge numbers of adverse effects, the Nordstream pipeline was blown up by the US as part of Biden's proxy war to weaken Russia and there is a huge variation of opinion from experts on global warming. The evidence to support all these issues is now in the public domain but mainstream media is only slowly embracing it and there is a reticence among those who believed the narratives to admit they were wrong. Remember how Ivermectin was ridiculed as a therapy for Covid? There are plenty of peer-reviewed papers now saying just the opposite.

The censuring of huge numbers of experts during Covid is probably the worst example of attacks on freedom of speech and we have a right to ask how the powers that be actually got away with it. Unless the public realises what has been going on, it will only get worse. 1984 was meant to be a warning, not a workshop manual! Can anyone offer some optimism on the subject?

Mollygo Wed 01-Mar-23 10:16:43

choughdancer

I don't think being reluctant or cautious to say things is the same as not having freedom of speech. We are free to say anything we like, but may hold back for all sorts of reasons; it doesn't mean we are not free to say it!

Exactly.

Grantanow Wed 01-Mar-23 11:36:56

The distribution of intelligence in the population is well-described by a bell-shaped curve (most people being in the middle) but the ability of the population to analyse political and other discourse surely depends on learning how to do it. I think far more attention needs to be given, especially in state schools, to analysing text, written and spoken, for logical and illogical thinking and how to apply this to newspapers and the media generally. Imho not every child will be able to master that skill but it would help if they made some progress in that direction so they were not gulled by pundits, conspiracy theorists, politicians and self-appointed experts.

M0nica Wed 01-Mar-23 13:51:23

Choughdancer you are absolutely right.

Katie59 Wed 01-Mar-23 18:22:36

Intelligence has nothing to do with the ability to make logical or sensible decisions because personal prejudices, emotional reactions, not to mention political or financial gain all influence decisions

Johnson IS intelligent he backed Brexit as his best chance as PM, plenty of intelligent friends I know voted purely for emotional reasons, no logic whatsoever ever.

varian Wed 01-Mar-23 18:48:53

There are thing s I believe in, opinions which I hold strongly, which I chose not to express in certain company..

I know that being outspoken and telling what I believe to be the truth would result in the almost certain end of certain social relationships.

Am I a coward?

Mollygo Wed 01-Mar-23 19:30:17

No not a coward Varian, just sensible.