Baggs
PS I won't be swearing allegiance. I don't feel the need.
I think it's better, though, to have a "Head of State" who is symbolic and has no real political power. Their job is diplomatic and if they step out of line Parliament can deal with them.
Good post and I agree with all of it, Baggs.
To add to that:
I do think that the Royal Family's connections to charities and those that they founded are worthwhile and, because the Royal Family is involved, they are more high profile, attract business and other interests and help a much larger number of people.
A short-term President either may not be interested, not able to give a long-term commitment and may not attract much interest.
Other charities they support quietly and without fuss or fanfare.
I shan't be saluting.