I know, but Australia's a big place - and the majority isn't very fertile. What would happen to the outback, if there weren't any sheep?
Voting. I’m so glad we still have the ‘old fashioned’ system…
Sorry if there's already a thread about this - I have looked but not found one.
I can't get my head round the thinking behind these vegans taking lambs away from their mothers as a protest - a protest against what? People eating meat?
Actually the lambs looked old enough to survive without their mothers, and they must have been pretty tame or they'd never have been caught. I certainly couldn't go up to a lamb on a field and pick it up. My husband might be able to pick up one of his own lambs of he had a bucket of sheep nuts with him but otherwise its a terrible job involving herding them into a small space (usually with dogs) and cornering them, and they're so agile! A pet lamb will come running up to you like a puppy of course, but usually they run away.
What did they do with the lambs when they'd got them? How are they going to feed them? They look too mature for a bottle.
(How handy there was a photographer at the event!)
I know, but Australia's a big place - and the majority isn't very fertile. What would happen to the outback, if there weren't any sheep?
The outback would be like it was before Europeans took sheep there.
The domestication of animals from its earliest manifestation has been a mutual activity. Animals initially cooperating with man, for the benefit of both. Whether dogs scavenging around human habitation, for food, or cattle protected from predators.
What has happened is that the pendulum has swung too far. As industrialisation and technology engulfed agriculture and fewer people worked the land. the link between humans and beast has been broken and animals are either romantised and anthromorphisized, or seen as just another raw material to be exploited with out regard to the quality of their life. We need to move the balance back the other way.
Life in the wild is no bed of roses. Animals rarely live to old age as they succumb to injury, disease, starvation or predation, or a combination of these. What humans offer animals are protection from all these. Medical treatment for injury and illness, or it that is impossible, a quick death, food in times of scarcity, protection from predation, but a quick and sudden death at a time of our choosing. An apex predator, protects animals from the suffering of over population. Currently in most cases humans are the apex predator, and why not?
What we need to do is move back to is treating animals with humanity in life, giving them living conditions that meet their basic needs and breeding out overbred characteristics that can make their lives a burden, such as huge milk yields from dairy cows.
It will make meat and dairy products, more scarce and more expensive, but there is a big enough range of foodstuffs in the world for no one to die of starvation or malnutrition. Humans have succeeded because they are omnivores, who learnt to cook, and i do not think this will ever change.
vegansrock
The outback would be like it was before Europeans took sheep there.
🤔
Dry and arid desert, much of it, other parts lush; there is huge diversity.
The Outback is not totally populated by sheep!
Or cattle stations.
or seen as just another raw material to be exploited with out regard to the quality of their life.
M0nica
Most, perhaps not all, farmers care for their animals.
Neglecting them or keeping them on poor conditions results in less profit so would be a foolish move.
What we need to do in this country is to fight against the huge factory farms as seen in the States. We've more or less succeeded in this here with egg production but people still want cheaper and cheaper food as finances tighten.
We've become used to food costing us a low proportion of average income in this country while property prices and rents have soared.
Callistemon21
vegansrock
The outback would be like it was before Europeans took sheep there.
🤔
Dry and arid desert, much of it, other parts lush; there is huge diversity.
The Outback is not totally populated by sheep!
Or cattle stations.
I was being flippant.
The point I was making is that there are vast areas of the world which just are not suitable for arable farming, so claims that land now being used for livestock could be used to grow crops aren't quite true.
Humans have always used whatever land (and technology) was available to them to produce food.
By the way, the humble turnip was significant because turnips could be used for over-wintering livestock, so they didn't need slaughtering before winter. Turnips also have deep roots and can extract nutrients from quite deep. The animal waste then fertilised the soil, so that heavier crop yields were achieved. There was no need for a fallow year. Clever stuff, huh?
www.britannica.com/topic/Norfolk-four-course-system
MOnica I agree with your post of 8.07. You've expressed clearly what I've been trying to say.
Clever stuff, huh?
Yes.
2nd Viscount Townshend aka Turnip Townshend!
I was being flippant
It's ok, I got it. 😁
I was answering vegansrock who perhaps thought the Outback was all lush before sheep arrived there.
I think rabbits do a lot of damage causing soil erosion.
Another introduced species.
Why do people feel a need to defend meat eating so intensely? It’s not as though vegans have any power to stop it.
nightowl
Why do people feel a need to defend meat eating so intensely? It’s not as though vegans have any power to stop it.
Why do vegans feel the need to impose their beliefs on the other 99% of the population
I didn’t think the outback was lush. Where did so say that? Why do we have to destroy every environment - rain forests chopped down for cheap beef burgers and fodder for pigs. People should stop trying to convince people that we are doing animals a favour by eating them.
vegansrock
I didn’t think the outback was lush. Where did so say that? Why do we have to destroy every environment - rain forests chopped down for cheap beef burgers and fodder for pigs. People should stop trying to convince people that we are doing animals a favour by eating them.
We ate meat until a few years ago. Don't care to eat meat now.
However, in past we ate delicious Iberian pork. It's a sustainable answer for organic pig farming. The non-ruminant pigs eat acorns and produce far less methane than ruminant cows.
Now, if everyone in Australia ate free range rabbit it would solve a few problems!
I didn’t think the outback was lush
No you didn't say that.
But it can be. It's not all desert. The Outback is huge and spans several climate zones.
nightowl
Why do people feel a need to defend meat eating so intensely? It’s not as though vegans have any power to stop it.
But they try. Isn't that why the three lambs were stolen?
Callistemon21
Now, if everyone in Australia ate free range rabbit it would solve a few problems!
I didn’t think the outback was lush
No you didn't say that.
But it can be. It's not all desert. The Outback is huge and spans several climate zones.
Can people knit with rabbit fur?
growstuff
nightowl
Why do people feel a need to defend meat eating so intensely? It’s not as though vegans have any power to stop it.
But they try. Isn't that why the three lambs were stolen?
I don't think people are vociferous about meat eating but if someone is attacked it's usual to put up some kind of defence. Meat eaters have been called names and attacked on GN in the past but tend not to attack vegans for their views.
Each to their own views.
But alleged facts need to be substantiated.
As far as my own meat eating habits are concerned, it's a bit ironic because I hardly eat any meat, although I do eat dairy and eggs.
If I appear vociferous, it's because I object to being told about the virtues of veganism as a solution to high food prices (which has happened on GN) and that I could easily adapt a vegan diet to my T2 diabetic needs, when I know very well how difficult that would be.
I also think it's unrealistic to think the whole world is going to become vegan for the reasons I've already given. The change to the way the world operates would be colossal. We've already witnessed the poverty which eating grains such as quinoa has caused and nobody has said where extremely poor peasants in third world countries would get their protein and fat, if they didn't have a few chickens and a goat.
Callistemon21 My personal view is that the majority of animals reared in this country are not reared to an acceptable welfare standard. Organisations like the RSPCA, only set minimal standards, below which they consider care to be cruelty.
I would say that if we need to feed animals food that their digestive systems cannot properly digest and which causes them pain and discomfort; feeding cattle soya, maize or rapeseed, for example and if many acres of virgin forest and jungle are being destroyed to grow them, then I would say, that is both environmentally damaging as well as animal cruelty.
Totally agree with your post of 15.36.58 growstuff
I wouldn’t dream of trying to convert a vegetarian or vegan to eat meat, I cater for all dietary requirements when we have guests.
I am fed up with vegans and vegetarians preaching and trying to convert myself and other meat eaters.
GrannyGravy13
Totally agree with your post of 15.36.58 growstuff
I wouldn’t dream of trying to convert a vegetarian or vegan to eat meat, I cater for all dietary requirements when we have guests.
I am fed up with vegans and vegetarians preaching and trying to convert myself and other meat eaters.
I agree GrannyGravy
And growstuff -ditto-
Catering for an assortment of dietary requirements and necessities can be challenging.
We're having fish tonight
I await the brickbats .....
I have never found vegetarians at all preachy. The reasons they have gone vegetarian are so many and various and their attitudes to dairy/eggs etc vary as much as their reasons. It is just a diet choice they have made.
But vegans are the only people who seem to turn their eating habits into a religion and endow it with virtues otherwise connected with the divine, and they do have a tendency to proselytise like Jehovah's Witnesses. Other religions have eating restrictions, but the religion comes first. They do not worship their dietary choices nor think it endows them with any special virtue.
I don’t think of choosing what to eat for dinner akin to a religion and I don’t go around criticising others for their choices . Don’t make sweeping generalisations. some tend to lump all vegans / vegetarians as weirdos with a mental illness /eating disorder who must be less healthy than those who stuff themselves with pork pies and burgers. I get why people eat meat, some of my close family do, they like it and are used to it. However, for many reasons I do think we should encourage people to eat less meat and think more about our environment and the creatures we share it with, . I don’t mean being religious or preachy. Fair play if people wish to defend their eating habits, but that doesn’t mean attacking or insulting those who do not share them. That’s a two way street btw.
M0nica
I have never found vegetarians at all preachy. The reasons they have gone vegetarian are so many and various and their attitudes to dairy/eggs etc vary as much as their reasons. It is just a diet choice they have made.
But vegans are the only people who seem to turn their eating habits into a religion and endow it with virtues otherwise connected with the divine, and they do have a tendency to proselytise like Jehovah's Witnesses. Other religions have eating restrictions, but the religion comes first. They do not worship their dietary choices nor think it endows them with any special virtue.
What a very unpleasant post about vegans. Absolute nonsense.
I know lots of vegans, never ever been preached at
They didn't even complain when my attempt at a vegan birthday cake to bring to work and share was... I don't know how to describe what that was lol
M0nica
I have never found vegetarians at all preachy. The reasons they have gone vegetarian are so many and various and their attitudes to dairy/eggs etc vary as much as their reasons. It is just a diet choice they have made.
But vegans are the only people who seem to turn their eating habits into a religion and endow it with virtues otherwise connected with the divine, and they do have a tendency to proselytise like Jehovah's Witnesses. Other religions have eating restrictions, but the religion comes first. They do not worship their dietary choices nor think it endows them with any special virtue.
The ones I know (and am related to) aren't at all. Of course, I cook for them quite happily.
It was on here.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.