Freya5
MayBee70
Isnāt it because of people like them that the Privileges Committee have had to be protected?
What from disagreeing with the proceedi gs. You really want a Parliament shut up because someone said something harman didn't like. A lot of what they have pointed out is true,prejudge g for a start.
It is nothing to do with what she does or doesn't like. I repeat:
I think there is a lack of understanding free speech. It is not an absolute right. There are limitations to ensure that it is not exercised in a way which causes harm to others.
The seat of our democracy is Parliament.
The House of Commons voted for the Priviledges Committee to carry out an inquiry - unanimously.
The House of Commons approved a motion to appoint Harriet to the Committee on the understanding that she would take the role of Chair - unanimously.
The Committee is comprised of seven MPs: four Conservative, two Labour and one SNP. They are elected to serve on the Committee by the House of Commons, in proportion to the partiesā representation in the House.
Whatever any individual may think, they do not, as was explained above, have the right to say just what they like if it can be seen as contempt of Parliament.
Some things are bigger than than the individual and the seat of democracy is one of them.
This is the case for everyone in Parliament and has been through government after government.