Gransnet forums

News & politics

Lee Anderson, Conservative deputy chair says asylum seekers should ‘fuck off back to France’ if they don’t want to be housed on the Bobby Stockholm barge

(468 Posts)
Iam64 Tue 08-Aug-23 20:22:25

Alex Chalk the justice secretary described Anderson’s language as ‘salty’ but ‘not bigotry at all’ ‘his indignation is well placed’.

What is happening in our country when someone like Anderson is elevated then supported by our government

DaisyAnneReturns Wed 09-Aug-23 10:56:58

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2 Not just The Tories the Labour Party have not ruled out using barges and barracks to house refugees/asylum seekers.

So you prefer to accept the words of those you must know by now lie to you, and make poor attempts to criticise Labour telling you that, when they take office, things will not change overnight.

Did you really think they would?

Casdon Wed 09-Aug-23 11:00:34

maddyone

Casdon
As you worked in the NHS I find it difficult that you really think that personal care should be provided by the opposite sex, regardless of the patient/resident’s opinion. Some people are quite happy, but others are not. My own mother was one of those who did not want personal care provided by a man. Resident’s needs and preferences should always be respected where possible. It’s called dignity. My mother could do almost nothing for herself in the last few months, and so it was entirely correct that her dignity was respected in the way she preferred.

Care is routinely provided by people of the opposite sex in the NHS maddyone. People are able to state a preference if they prefer not to have a person of the opposite sex to provide personal care - but it’s much more difficult for men to have their wishes carried out on wards because most nurses are female.

Anniebach Wed 09-Aug-23 11:01:42

Yes Callistemon I have not commented on this thread until today, I am not listening to tory lies, I know there is a serious shortage of carers and lived in a situation where I couldn’t have a hot meal, to hear someone complain their living accommodation was too small !

Callistemon21 Wed 09-Aug-23 11:08:28

Anniebach

Yes Callistemon I have not commented on this thread until today, I am not listening to tory lies, I know there is a serious shortage of carers and lived in a situation where I couldn’t have a hot meal, to hear someone complain their living accommodation was too small !

I thought that's what you meant, Anniebach.

The problem is, we don't know if Labour's plans would work better. It's easy to claim what you would do in theory but the reality is often different. Where would they find the people to carry out all the fast-tracking? They would need to be thoroughly trained; inexperienced, poorly trained staff rushing through the enormous backlog could make many mistakes.

policymogul.com/key-updates/27360/yvette-cooper-illegal-migration-bill-statement-and-labour-s-five-point-plan-to-reform-the-asylum-system

maddyone Wed 09-Aug-23 11:14:05

Casdon
I understand what you’re saying, and in emergencies and where people are in hospital, then it’s needs must, but in private residential homes, there’s no excuse for personal care not to be provided by the sex preferred. And in these homes, the men are very much outnumbered by the female residents.

maddyone Wed 09-Aug-23 11:19:50

Even if it was possible to fast track asylum applications, it doesn’t solve the problems of where to house them, or too few GPs, too few medical facilities, too few school places, too many cars and gas boilers producing too much pollution. The problem isn’t these particular migrants, it’s too many people trying to get into a country that hasn’t got the facilities for the people already here, let alone hundreds of thousands more every year.
Has anyone read the threads on trying to get a GP appointment?

HousePlantQueen Wed 09-Aug-23 11:22:11

I have read the first couple of pages of this thread and I am disgusted. Disgusted , but not surprised by the language of the yobbish Anderson ( thrown out of the Labour party, by the way), but disgusted by the hypocrisy of those on here who were going on and on about the use of 'scum' by Angela Rayner, but suddenly are applauding and excusing the language of Anderson because he is 'frustrated'. Disgusted by the lack of empathy, disgusted by the ease with which so many of you jump on the bandwagon. Disgusted that so many of you think that the dire dreadful state of this country is down to a few desperate people off the shore of Dorset.

As for those of you quick to swallow the nonsense and lies about 'left lawyers' and do gooders' and 'charities'.....well, I hope none of you need their help in any way soon.

You should be ashamed of yourselves. Grown adults, supposedly with critical thinking ability and you are all responding to the dog whistle lies of your so called betters.

Those of you bravely trying to get the other side across, thank you.

the rest of you should be, but wont, hang your heads. Sometime soon, you do realise, it will be you, pensioners, or sick, or disabled, those no economically active, who will be told to 'fuck off'. Lee Anderson is just the first to express what your so called government think of us.

teachkate Wed 09-Aug-23 11:24:02

^^^^Urmstongran
Well I think he speaks for the silent majority in this country. Decent, clean basic accommodation and 3 meals a day? Gym use. Free buses into Weymouth. Doctor and dentist on call. Pocket money. A mobile phone. A games room and library.

What did these migrants expect? Hotel bed and board? That’s what they’ve been hearing from their mates. It’s time to make being over here clean but basic so that a few phone calls back across the Channel put some migrants off paying extortionate fees to traffickers. We are such a soft touch. France laughs at our naïveté.

It’s time we in the UK woke up. £6 million PER DAY this is costing the taxpayer here. Yes, decent living quarters ought to be provided. But these migrants (assisted by Care4Calais and lawyers whose best interests are served by thwarting all proposals - money in their coffers by keeping this roundabout turning) need a reality check.

He certainly doesn’t speak for me nor offer my thoughts - by an accident of birth we all sit in judgement of these desperate refugees - ‘there but for the grace of God’ - we live in a free civilised country and should offer help to others

SuzyG Wed 09-Aug-23 11:24:39

@MaizieD - Yes, yes, yes! smile

orly Wed 09-Aug-23 11:28:19

Chocolatelovinggran

Frustration can be expressed without the use of foul language Primrose.

That's right - you could just stamp on someone's back and miss the rest of the Women's World Cup

I've seen much worse language on GN and MN

ruthiek Wed 09-Aug-23 11:35:03

Chocolate loving gran, but do you think he would have the airtime if he hadn’t used used it. It was borne out of frustration, I don’t think the politicians realise the strength of feeling about this and before I get roasted I believe in managed immigration but not these young fit men who throw their details away and expect to get the handouts straight away

bear1 Wed 09-Aug-23 11:35:10

apart from the swear word i do agree with him why are they refusing to on board a tethered ship beside a dock where they have a room and three meals a day and pocket money which is a lot more than our homeless and older people are offered also better accommodation than alot of our military and their families are living in

Wyllow3 Wed 09-Aug-23 11:38:27

Why is the government not immediately starting a recruitment and training programme for the processing system?

We've all agreed it is needed

We've all agreed it takes time, you can't magically produce workers

We've agreed that it takes 3 years here compared to named EU countries

We've known quite well the problems has been accumulating for several years

So why oh why are they not starting NOW?

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 09-Aug-23 11:40:17

teachkate

^^^^^^Urmstongran
Well I think he speaks for the silent majority in this country. Decent, clean basic accommodation and 3 meals a day? Gym use. Free buses into Weymouth. Doctor and dentist on call. Pocket money. A mobile phone. A games room and library.

What did these migrants expect? Hotel bed and board? That’s what they’ve been hearing from their mates. It’s time to make being over here clean but basic so that a few phone calls back across the Channel put some migrants off paying extortionate fees to traffickers. We are such a soft touch. France laughs at our naïveté.

It’s time we in the UK woke up. £6 million PER DAY this is costing the taxpayer here. Yes, decent living quarters ought to be provided. But these migrants (assisted by Care4Calais and lawyers whose best interests are served by thwarting all proposals - money in their coffers by keeping this roundabout turning) need a reality check.

He certainly doesn’t speak for me nor offer my thoughts - by an accident of birth we all sit in judgement of these desperate refugees - ‘there but for the grace of God’ - we live in a free civilised country and should offer help to others

Why are they desperate? How many safe countries have they passed through?

He speaks for me. Perhaps the language comes from his Labour roots.

Cid24 Wed 09-Aug-23 11:43:13

Nana54
I’ve been tempted on many an occasion!

spabbygirl Wed 09-Aug-23 11:46:37

I blame the idiots who voted these people in, Labour have a great plan, assess people before they get on a small boat, it means increasing border control staff in Calais but those who are offered a place could simply get on P&O ferry, no small boats required so the criminal gangs that run them would be out of a job.
The current gov are engineering this problem cos it's the only thing they can boast about pre election, they can hardly say they've done wonders with the NHS, Police, Education can they? Even though they spend more money on the NHS because they use private companies the shareholders expect a payout, and a healthy one too. Send the NHS back to how it was with funding like that and we'd have a 1st class system. However they do it, I'm voting Labour for the NHS, they started it, they can fix it, our NHS needs you!

BevSec Wed 09-Aug-23 11:46:57

Absolutely agree with you.

HousePlantQueen Wed 09-Aug-23 11:47:07

Germanshepherdsmum

teachkate

^^^^Urmstongran
Well I think he speaks for the silent majority in this country. Decent, clean basic accommodation and 3 meals a day? Gym use. Free buses into Weymouth. Doctor and dentist on call. Pocket money. A mobile phone. A games room and library.

What did these migrants expect? Hotel bed and board? That’s what they’ve been hearing from their mates. It’s time to make being over here clean but basic so that a few phone calls back across the Channel put some migrants off paying extortionate fees to traffickers. We are such a soft touch. France laughs at our naïveté.

It’s time we in the UK woke up. £6 million PER DAY this is costing the taxpayer here. Yes, decent living quarters ought to be provided. But these migrants (assisted by Care4Calais and lawyers whose best interests are served by thwarting all proposals - money in their coffers by keeping this roundabout turning) need a reality check.

He certainly doesn’t speak for me nor offer my thoughts - by an accident of birth we all sit in judgement of these desperate refugees - ‘there but for the grace of God’ - we live in a free civilised country and should offer help to others

Why are they desperate? How many safe countries have they passed through?

He speaks for me. Perhaps the language comes from his Labour roots.

well he does not speak for me. He was expelled from the Labour party due to his inappropriate behaviour, bullying, sexual harassment. Found a good home in the Tory party.

Anyone like to comment on the fact that the first applicant they spoke to came over on a plane? Isn't that what they are supposed to do?

foxie48 Wed 09-Aug-23 11:48:05

Anderson is a vile man who panders to the worst in people and language like that should not be used by someone in his position. I didn't defend Rayner's use of language and I certainly won't defend Anderson's either.
For the record, the money being spent on housing migrants rather than getting on and processing their claims is coming from the Overseas Aid budget. so instead of improving the lives of people living in poor countries we are spending the money in the UK. Good wheeze that, I wonder how much comes back to the govt via taxes of one sort or another and it's also a good way of stirring people up. Look how much it's costing you, look at these images of fit young black men in little boats, see how corrupt black lawyers take money to help them get asylum etc etc?? The govt chooses to do that rather than using the overseas budget as it should be used eg to cure trachoma, provide clean water, educate children etc etc all those things that help to make countries better so less likely to have civil unrest, wars etc. IMO if we want to reduce the number of refugees the money is better spent helping people in their own countries than housing them on barges and in hotels in this country!

JdotJ Wed 09-Aug-23 11:48:51

Urmstongran

Well I think he speaks for the silent majority in this country. Decent, clean basic accommodation and 3 meals a day? Gym use. Free buses into Weymouth. Doctor and dentist on call. Pocket money. A mobile phone. A games room and library.

What did these migrants expect? Hotel bed and board? That’s what they’ve been hearing from their mates. It’s time to make being over here clean but basic so that a few phone calls back across the Channel put some migrants off paying extortionate fees to traffickers. We are such a soft touch. France laughs at our naïveté.

It’s time we in the UK woke up. £6 million PER DAY this is costing the taxpayer here. Yes, decent living quarters ought to be provided. But these migrants (assisted by Care4Calais and lawyers whose best interests are served by thwarting all proposals - money in their coffers by keeping this roundabout turning) need a reality check.

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

HousePlantQueen Wed 09-Aug-23 11:51:35

Foxie48. Thank you for the voice of intelligent common sense. Some of us can see that this country is being played. Sadly, many cannot.

Dilys Wed 09-Aug-23 11:54:39

He actually said 'illegal immigrants' not asylum seekers. Two different beasts.
Most if the migrants are male, economic migrants and should be returned to the land from whence they came. I don't have a problem with genuine refugees seeking asylum, but mist of these immigrants are not refugees. All the people complaining about accommodation on the barges ought to look at what condition British families are living in if they become homeless, or can't afford high rents. Puts the barges into perspective. They also have a choice not to come here in the first place

Anniebach Wed 09-Aug-23 11:56:10

I didn’t know those on the boats were black or the lawyers speaking for them were black , Foxie48 you met these people ?

Chocolatelovinggran Wed 09-Aug-23 11:56:13

Orly - disgusting behaviour and disgusting language is wrong whoever perpetuates it. I am not on mumsnet, but if and when I see such language on Gransnet you may be sure that I will call it out. Frustration is no defence for vile words, we are all frustrated sometimes but most of us can express ourselves without recourse to the language of the gutter.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 09-Aug-23 11:59:42

It is perfectly lawful to use part of the overseas aid budget on asylum seekers here. It’s not a ‘wheeze’.

We have been giving overseas aid for many years and it does little good given the corruption and tribal wars in many of the countries it goes to. Much of it is completely wasted.