Interesting article - Harry the trauma exhibitionist.

Glorianny

Anniebach

Unsuspecting girl ! Her sister had dated Charles, her father worked for the Queen, her grandmother for the Queen mother
what a gift Diana could and did give daddy.

She was 20. She thought she was getting a proper marriage with a man who loved her. She didn't realise he was just after someone to continue the Windsor line.

I doubt that she was as naïve as everyone keeps trying to portray. She and her siblings grew up on the Sandringham Estate around the younger Royal siblings.
She was more Royal than the Windsors.

All they had were lies ?

What did Diana mean in her tell all book ?

Andrew was always playing games, I knew he wasn’t for me

She was 20. She thought she was getting a proper marriage with a man who loved her. She didn't realise he was just after someone to continue the Windsor line.

IYO G.
Your evidence?
Are you saying that you were a personal confidante of Diana?
Anything else is hearsay.

Wow!
The hatred!
Not to mention all the tired cliches: unsuspecting girl, past lover, confidante, brood mare, crowned his one-time mistress, and of course, dysfunctional family.

More like Barbara Cartland, Diana's preferred choice of reading.

Jenpax and gloryannie you’re wasting your time. For what it’s worth, I agree with your posts. The vitriol directed at Harry, Meghan and Diana never ceases to amaze me.

Vitriol directed at the royal family pleases you Iam ?

Jaberwok

I think that from what can be gathered, Windsor men rely to a greater degree on strong women. Not sure about Edward V11th, but George Vth relied a lot on Queen Mary, George V1th relied heavily on the late Q.M, Charles 111rd certainly needs Queen Camilla, William again has a very strong steady wife, all of whom have been good for them and the RF. However, Harry along with Edward V111th also married strong women whom they completely relied/rely on. Unfortunately both Wallis and particularly Meghan couldn't have been worse for them

Why is Meghan bad for Harry? The have 2 beautiful children and seem happy.

My old friend who frequently went shooting with the Spencers describes her as anything but naive.

Germanshepherdsmum

My old friend who frequently went shooting with the Spencers describes her as anything but naive.

Because of course she was shooting with them all the time.

Anniebach

Vitriol directed at the royal family pleases you Iam ?

No. Family estrangement is dreadful for everyone imvolved

Germanshepherdsmum

My old friend who frequently went shooting with the Spencers describes her as anything but naive.

What did she do to make them think that?

I can’t divulge that.

Glorianny

Germanshepherdsmum

My old friend who frequently went shooting with the Spencers describes her as anything but naive.

Because of course she was shooting with them all the time.

A lot of socialising goes on. She didn’t have to be shooting.

Anything else is hearsay

About all of it.

My friend’s comments to me are not hearsay. If I were to repeat them, which I never would, what I said would be hearsay.

Germanshepherdsmum

I can’t divulge that.

Oh why bring them up then?

Having heard someone else’s opinion is hearsay.
Knowing something that you’re not at liberty to release, is like not knowing it at all.

Germanshepherdsmum

My friend’s comments to me are not hearsay. If I were to repeat them, which I never would, what I said would be hearsay.

Fair enough.

It wasn't directed at you, it's a comment about all the absolute assertions about the Royal Family on the thread when most people know no more than they have read in the media.
The same media which they profess to despise and disbelieve when media stories about certain other members of the Royal Family are printed.

Yes I realised that. 😊

Mollygo

Having heard someone else’s opinion is hearsay.
Knowing something that you’re not at liberty to release, is like not knowing it at all.

That’s not quite right in law but never mind. People often don’t understand what hearsay is,

WellsRose

Germanshepherdsmum

I can’t divulge that.

Oh why bring them up then?

Why not bring it up? I can say somebody told me something without being obliged to reveal the details.

Of course you're not obliged and I'm entitled to think that trying to blackened someone's name without saying why is gutless.

I am not trying to blacken anyone’s name, nor am I gutless as you so charmingly put it.

Whatever the law can twist it to mean,
it’s clear enough.
Hearsay- I hear someone say it
It means you weren’t there and heard it from a third party.
If you were there and saw it, it’s not hearsay.