Gransnet forums

News & politics

Conscription

(162 Posts)
Doodledog Wed 24-Jan-24 22:26:09

There has been a lot in the news about whether the UK will need to conscript citizens in the event of an increasingly likely war in future. What do people make of this?

It could be that the head of the armed forces is trying to cause an outcry so that more funds go into defence, or it may be that we do need to be ready to defend ourselves. Clearly our generations are unlikely to be required as ‘boots on the ground’ but our children and/or grandchildren might be, and we could be expected to do ‘something’ depending on the nature of the conflict.

Should defence be paid for from taxation, should we all get involved in some way, should there be national service of some kind (and if so, what kind?) or something else? Should there be age limits or should we all be expected to ‘do something’?

I’m not sure what to think, beyond that whatever happens should be fair. Maybe non-taxpayers should be expected to ‘do something’ in lieu of contributing financially to society beyond their families? Maybe workplaces with more than x employees should have to give a day off a month for people to ‘do something’? I don’t know. By ‘do something’ I am not suggesting taking up arms or fitness training - there will be many ways that people could help. It could formalise the voluntary work that many people do anyway, maybe cut loneliness, keep people fit - there are all kinds of possible benefits - but should it be compulsory?

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 10:38:09

Whitewavemark2

The wrong time to introduce the idea of conscription it seems from social media

People struggling, think that the government has little time for them and their struggles so the reply can be summed up like this

“We starve you, freeze you, exploit you, repeatedly infect you, steal your pensions, remove your opportunities, saddle you with debt, deny you housing, gaslight you, demonise you ....

Oh, and by the way, will you lay down your life for us”

First you need to treat your citizens with respect before asking them to lay down their lives for a country where only the rich seem to benefit.

Asked about Gen Sanders’ remarks, Rishi Sunak’s official spokesperson said “hypothetical scenarios” about potential future conflicts were “not helpful”. When asked if he agreed with the general, the spokesperson replied simply “no”.

Grantanow Thu 25-Jan-24 10:38:55

Maybe we should pay our soldiers more to aid recruitment.

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 10:45:23

I don't think the pay is poor.

Army:
£18,00 for a new recruit, £23,000 for a private.
£28,800 for officers in training

Comparable across the forces.

Accommodation and keep is charged unless deployed.

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 10:48:09

University paid for - no student debt but a salary whilst a student.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 25-Jan-24 11:03:53

Callistemon21

Whitewavemark2

The wrong time to introduce the idea of conscription it seems from social media

People struggling, think that the government has little time for them and their struggles so the reply can be summed up like this

“We starve you, freeze you, exploit you, repeatedly infect you, steal your pensions, remove your opportunities, saddle you with debt, deny you housing, gaslight you, demonise you ....

Oh, and by the way, will you lay down your life for us”

First you need to treat your citizens with respect before asking them to lay down their lives for a country where only the rich seem to benefit.

^Asked about Gen Sanders’ remarks, Rishi Sunak’s official spokesperson said “hypothetical scenarios” about potential future conflicts were “not helpful”. When asked if he agreed with the general, the spokesperson replied simply “no”.^

The generals should never ever play a part in politics. They did so before the WW1 with disastrous results and a needless war, which in turned spawned the fascist dictator and the horror of WW2 - really a continuation of WW1.

25Avalon Thu 25-Jan-24 11:04:56

Traditionally The USA had policies not to get involved in war in Europe, which is why they didn’t join the WW1 and WW11 at the beginning. Things have moved on however with United Nations and NATO and for the US to pull out can have dire results such as in Afghanistan - oh that was Biden.

Perhaps we need conscription or rather in some training sessions but can we afford that? Investing in technology, something we’ve always been good at is probably the best option but again needs money.

NotSpaghetti Thu 25-Jan-24 11:22:17

Pulling out of Afghanistan was a bad decision by Trump when it was settled (mainly) and costing little.

It was an entirely political move.

Biden however executed it badly in my opinion.

NotSpaghetti Thu 25-Jan-24 11:22:32

...and so did we!

Keeper1 Thu 25-Jan-24 11:26:54

Maybe people will feel differently if it means living under Russia or China’s rule.

MaizieD Thu 25-Jan-24 11:57:32

Keeper1

Maybe people will feel differently if it means living under Russia or China’s rule.

What would Russia or China want with the UK? War and occupation is frequently about access to resources. We don't have any resources in sufficient quantity to be attractive.

I also doubt that either country. Russia in particular, has the capability to subjugate the whole of Europe, which they would have to do, I think, to keep the UK under control...

Apart from that I have to ask "What is the [expletive deleted] point of war?" It's all willie waving and alpha males, isn't it...

AGAA4 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:02:23

I agree. Testosterone fuelled aggression causes conflict.

luluaugust Thu 25-Jan-24 12:12:19

Remember the 1933 debate when the Oxford Union passed the motion that they wouldn’t fight. They did along with thousands of others who had no desire for war.

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:13:45

Whitewavemark2

Callistemon21

Whitewavemark2

The wrong time to introduce the idea of conscription it seems from social media

People struggling, think that the government has little time for them and their struggles so the reply can be summed up like this

“We starve you, freeze you, exploit you, repeatedly infect you, steal your pensions, remove your opportunities, saddle you with debt, deny you housing, gaslight you, demonise you ....

Oh, and by the way, will you lay down your life for us”

First you need to treat your citizens with respect before asking them to lay down their lives for a country where only the rich seem to benefit.

^Asked about Gen Sanders’ remarks, Rishi Sunak’s official spokesperson said “hypothetical scenarios” about potential future conflicts were “not helpful”. When asked if he agreed with the general, the spokesperson replied simply “no”.^

The generals should never ever play a part in politics. They did so before the WW1 with disastrous results and a needless war, which in turned spawned the fascist dictator and the horror of WW2 - really a continuation of WW1.

I agree!!

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:15:34

Apart from that I have to ask "What is the [expletive deleted] point of war?" It's all willie waving and alpha males, isn't it...
😁 yea!

Defence is not aggression.

MaizieD Thu 25-Jan-24 12:16:14

luluaugust

Remember the 1933 debate when the Oxford Union passed the motion that they wouldn’t fight. They did along with thousands of others who had no desire for war.

Despite my huge distaste for the utter futility of war I can appreciate that there's not much you can do if someone is about to invade your country... fight or go under...

MaizieD Thu 25-Jan-24 12:17:40

See, I ate some of my words while you were posting, Callistemon grin

I do hate the whole concept, though.

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:17:57

luluaugust

Remember the 1933 debate when the Oxford Union passed the motion that they wouldn’t fight. They did along with thousands of others who had no desire for war.

Very few desire war.

However, sometimes it is necessary to defend people's rights including the right to peace and freedom.

If brave people had not fought for liberty in WW2 how many more people would Hitler have exterminated?

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:18:41

MaizieD

See, I ate some of my words while you were posting, Callistemon grin

I do hate the whole concept, though.

I did type yes but yea will do just as well 😁

LizzieDrip Thu 25-Jan-24 12:25:40

*“We starve you, freeze you, exploit you, repeatedly infect you, steal your pensions, remove your opportunities, saddle you with debt, deny you housing, gaslight you, demonise you ....

Oh, and by the way, will you lay down your life for us”

First you need to treat your citizens with respect before asking them to lay down their lives for a country where only the rich seem to benefit.*

This 💯%! I have two teenage GC who, I know, would not sign up and I would totally support them. I and my family will not be signing up for anything to do with war.

Callistemon21 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:26:48

War

Or Defence?

GrannyGravy13 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:33:24

We have several family and extended family members who are currently serving in our armed forces, I couldn’t be more proud of them.

It has always been scary when they have been deployed to a war zone, even scarier when they are on so called peace keeping duties.

nexus63 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:45:40

my son was in the TA in the early 2000, one of the army big wigs came to give a talk about how bad things were in iraq and they are looking for volunteers, my son came home that night and said, i am going to iraq, he was given 12 weeks training then off to the front line, it was the most awful 6 months of my life, i asked him how it was when he came back, the only thing he said was some of my friends were killed and i never want to talk about it again.

GrannyGravy13 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:53:02

nexus63 💐 our son was also in Iraq, very difficult time for service families.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 25-Jan-24 12:54:35

GrannyGravy13

We have several family and extended family members who are currently serving in our armed forces, I couldn’t be more proud of them.

It has always been scary when they have been deployed to a war zone, even scarier when they are on so called peace keeping duties.

That is their chosen career, far far different to a conscript army.

GrannyGravy13 Thu 25-Jan-24 13:04:06

Whitewavemark2

GrannyGravy13

We have several family and extended family members who are currently serving in our armed forces, I couldn’t be more proud of them.

It has always been scary when they have been deployed to a war zone, even scarier when they are on so called peace keeping duties.

That is their chosen career, far far different to a conscript army.

I have faith in our young folk, and like to think that if the U.K. were to be in a situation where we had to defend our shores that there would be queues outside the offices to sign up voluntarily.

Conscription should only ever be used as a last resort.