Should Starmer sue Sunak?

Seems to me slippery Starmer will do/ say/ change his mind /anything to become Prime Minister he has no scruples in my opinion.

To be fair I want people to change their mind about the sex/gender issue, I dont want to be howling into a void. Its no good being all pure about when people realised there was a problem.

Basically, Starmer knows he now has Sunak on toast.

He'll bide his time, as he did with Johnson and the parties.

Wily old DPP knows all about timing.

Galaxy

To be fair I want people to change their mind about the sex/gender issue, I dont want to be howling into a void. Its no good being all pure about when people realised there was a problem.

Starmer’s reluctance to be hounded to make simplistic one liners on the trans issue has been supported by the Brianna tragedy. Brianna’s parents refer to her as their daughter

That doesn't alter my position though Iam64, what Starmer chooses to do is up to him. I am not cheering him on on this. I am cheering him for the way he altered Labours position on single sex spaces though.

Nicenanny3

Seems to me slippery Starmer will do/ say/ change his mind /anything to become Prime Minister he has no scruples in my opinion.

And then there was the time he was going to build a bridge between Scotland and Ireland. Oh, hang on a minute...

Totally agree with you Germanshepherdsmum.

Casdon

Mollygo
Casdon
Why trot it out when you have been told in advance that the mother of a murdered trans teenager is in the building and expected to attend PMQ though Germanshepherdsmum? There isn’t any excuse, surely.

Exactly Casdon
Why did Starmer trot out Brianna’s name when he knew her mother would be in the building?
There isn’t any excuse, surely.
There is no excuse for either of them, I’ve already said that - but why Sunak’s supporters don’t acknowledge his part in this I don’t understand.

If you read the posts carefully, many posters including me, aren’t excusing Sunak.

There is no excuse for either of them, I’ve already said that - but why Starmer’s supporters don’t acknowledge his part in this I don’t understand.

After Starmer seemed to take delight in mentioning Brianna’s name & pointing to the gallery, although he must have known her mother hadn’t yet arrived, it became inexcusable point scoring, as well as the fact that no-one is supposed to be identified by name ( surely he must know that! ). He has slipped so far in my estimation I couldn’t possibly vote for him in the next election. He obviously speaks before thinking of the consequences so can’t be respected.

If Sunak was capable of thinking on his feet he would have had the sense to not use the scripted comment about Starmer.

Mollygo

Casdon

Mollygo
Casdon
Why trot it out when you have been told in advance that the mother of a murdered trans teenager is in the building and expected to attend PMQ though Germanshepherdsmum? There isn’t any excuse, surely.

Exactly Casdon
Why did Starmer trot out Brianna’s name when he knew her mother would be in the building?
There isn’t any excuse, surely.
There is no excuse for either of them, I’ve already said that - but why Sunak’s supporters don’t acknowledge his part in this I don’t understand.

If you read the posts carefully, many posters including me, aren’t excusing Sunak.

^There is no excuse for either of them, I’ve already said that - but why Starmer’s supporters don’t acknowledge his part in this I don’t understand.^

I don’t know who you’re talking about Mollygo, but I’m a Starmer supporter who has said from the outset that in my view it was six of one and half a dozen of the other.

I don’t know who you’re talking about Mollygo, but I’m a Starmer supporter who has said from the outset that in my view it was six of one and half a dozen of the other.

Not on this thread Casdon.

14:19 today you finally said

There is no excuse for either of them. Until then I can find no mention from you on this thread acknowledging Starmer’s culpability.