Skydancer
I disagree with what KS has done re the heating allowance. My reasoning is that many pensioners are at home far more than those of working age. Personally, we can just about manage without the heating allowance but it certainly helped a lot not having to worry about the fuel bill especially as DH is on blood thinners and feels the cold badly. Also older people are slower to move around and get warm.
My reasoning is that many pensioners are at home far more than those of working age.
I think that's an important point.
And there will also be those pensioners who are ill or disabled to some extent, but not sufficiently to be eligible for benefits but who nevertheless cannot afford physically to live day to day in a home below a certain temperature.
Like your DH, my OH is disabled to the extent that he cannot move around to keep warm - he has even worn a cardigan this week - though I have to admit our house is made of stone so it doesn't hold the heat.
The country is not 'broke'. That is not how the economy works. Governments decide on what to spend and it's an ideological choice. The fiscal responsibility lies in not creating inflation.
I actually believe that Starmer is trying to look as 'tough' as the Tories on public spending because that is how he won over commerce and industry, investors, etc - and why so many Labour voters are disappointed in him.
But it should also be pointed out that the last government commissioned a consultation paper on public spending, and this - means testing of WFA - was one of the items for 'consideration'. I think it was going to happen sooner or later. But it should have happened later, in order to give those affected at least some time to budget for the money they are going to lose as I suspect quite a few might have already factored in the WFA in their budget.
Bad move.