Lahlah65
We do have a different system to other countries. In France they have ‘examining justices’ who direct the process of collecting evidence as well as making decisions. I don’t know if it is quicker though. In Finland, you cannot directly sue a doctor for negligence - the state has a system for providing compensation for medical negligence and then addresses issues of incompetence etc. Others might know more than me about how these systems work and whether they produce quicker results. It has taken many years and successive governments to reach this position - there are unlikely to be quick fixes. We are want to pay less tax and for things to be cheaper, without always thinking about the consequences.
Just look at the Trump trials in the US…convicted guilty in 3 …after years and years of faffing…yet not one penalty has he suffered yet. The sentencing of one has been postponed until after the election ( PRAY he doesn’t get in, he’s a dangerous megalomaniac) and the others seem to be on permanent appeal …. With the final arbitration the Supreme Court of whom 6 are so biased in his favour, they are bending the law to accommodate him! And if he wins he can wipe almost all trials against him anyway! Which is why he is desperate to win! There is Corruption everywhere!
Here the PO and Grenfell cases are horrendous with lifelong consequences for those still suffering, and lives lost…but the law obfuscates and delays and delays. The LAW needs a complete overhaul everywhere and set speedy time limits for dealing with such matters!